LIC HOUSING FINANCE LTD,MUMBAI vs. ACIT, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee is entitled to interest on the delayed refund. It relied on Supreme Court decisions which established that interest components partake of the character of 'amount due' and are eligible for interest under Section 244A.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed interest on a tax refund determined under the Vivad se Vishwas (VSVS) Act, 2020, which was released after a significant delay. The Assessing Officer (AO) and the Commissioner (Appeals) rejected this claim, stating that Section 244A of the Income Tax Act was not applicable to refunds under the VSVS scheme.
What were the issues?
Whether interest is allowable under Section 244A of the Income Tax Act on a tax refund determined under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, when the refund was delayed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Sandvik Asia Ltd. v. CIT96 citing280 ITR 643 · 2006 · SC · Read judgment
- Union of India v. Tata Chemicals Ltd.91 citing363 ITR 658 · 2014 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. HEG Ltd.63 citing189 Taxmann 335 · 2010 · SC
Before: SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR
PER PRABHASH SHANKAR [A.M.] :- The above captioned appeals have been filed by the assessee against the orders of even date passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “CIT(A)”] pertaining to the order passed u/s. 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as “Act”] for the Assessment Years [A.Y.] 2005- 06, 2006-07 and 2007-08. Since the issues are common and interlinked, these appeals are being taken up toget
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 244A
- Shailesh Khodabhai Ramani, Rajkot vs ITO, Ward-2(1)(3), RajkotITA 366/RJT/2024[2012-13]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Shailesh Khodabhai Ramani, Rajkot vs ITO, Ward-2(1)(5), RajkotITA 257/RJT/2024[2011-12]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2011-12
- Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment… vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 3453/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment… vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 6805/MUM/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Pratibha Sanjai Srivastava, Ahmedabad vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(2)(1), AhmedabadITA 2565/AHD/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2021-2022
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026