SPICE OF LIFE HOTELS AND ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT-2(3)(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the reopening of assessment under Section 148 beyond four years was invalid as there was no failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts. Consequently, the reassessment order and the penalty were quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee's case was reopened under Section 147 for AY 2014-15, leading to additions under Section 14A and a penalty under Section 271(1)(c). The assessee challenged the validity of the reassessment proceedings, arguing that there was no failure to disclose material facts.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the validity of reassessment proceedings initiated beyond four years without demonstrating the assessee's failure to disclose material facts. The secondary issue was the consequential penalty levied.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(15)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Kelvinator of India Ltd.1,673 citing320 ITR 561 · 2010 · SC · Read judgment
- GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. v. ITO1,349 citing259 ITR 19 · 2003 · SC · Read judgment
- Hindustan Lever Ltd. v. R.B. Wadkar695 citing268 ITR 332 · 2004 · HC
- Calcutta Discount Co. Ltd. v. ITO384 citing41 ITR 191 · 1961 · SC · Read judgment
- ITO v. TechSpan India (P) Ltd.194 citing92 Taxmann.com 361 · 2018 · SC · Read judgment
- 153 (Gujarat) 8 Shakti Karnawat v. ITO171 citing296 ITR 90 · 2008 · HC
- Idea Cellular Ltd. v. Dy. CIT107 citing301 ITR 407 · 2008 · HC
- Ser. Ltd. v. DCIT26 citing159 Taxmann.com 51 · 2015 · HC
- QX KPO Services (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT19 citing99 Taxmann.com 301 · 2018 · SC
- QX KPO Services (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT14 citing94 Taxmann.com 467 · 2018 · HC
- 206 (SC) Aroni Commercials Ltd. v. DCIT11 citing393 ITR 673 · 2017 · HC
- 361 (SC) PCTT v. Century Textiles & Industries Ltd.8 citing99 Taxmann.com 206 · 2018 · SC
- 262 (Bom. HC), Milton Plastics Ltd. v. Mudit Spice Life Hotels and Estates Pvt. Ltd. Nagpal5 citing151 Taxmann.com 24 · 2023 · HC
- 320 ITR 561 (SC) Idea Cellular Ltd. v. DCIT5 citing31 Taxmann.com 53 · 2013 · HC
- 206 (SC) Aroni Commercials Ltd. v. DCIT3 citing85 Taxmann.com 234 · 2017 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “G” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SMT. BEEBA PILLAI, JM & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, AM
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Per Arun Khodpia, AM: The captioned appeals are filed by the assessee against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/ National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi (in short “Ld. CIT(A)”, dated 23.09.2025 for AY 2014-15
ITA Nos. 7703 & 7704/Mum/2025 Spice Life Hotels and Estates Pvt. Ltd.
challenging the quantum additions made vide order under section 147 r.w.s. 143(3) dated 28.03.2022 and penalty order under section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 196
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026