MORANI FOURWHEELS PVT. LTD.,JAIPUR vs. ACIT, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the issue of excess salary payment required further examination due to insufficient material. Therefore, this specific ground was allowed for statistical purposes, remitting the matter back to the AO for fresh examination.
What were the facts?
The assessee challenged additions made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A) regarding disallowances under Section 40A(3) for cash payments and Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS, as well as disallowances on interest, conveyance, travelling, and excess salary payments. Some grounds were not pressed by the assessee.
What were the issues?
Whether cash payments exceeding Rs. 20,000 were made in violation of Section 40A(3) and whether disallowances for salary payments were justified based on the available evidence.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(5)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd.2,664 citing88 ITR 192 · 1973 · SC
- Attar Singh Gurmukh Singh v. ITO254 citing191 ITR 667 · 1991 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Ansal Landmark Township (P.) Ltd.177 citing234 Taxmann 825 · 2015 · HC
- Thomas George Muthoot v. CIT44 citing63 Taxmann.com 99 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
- Mudiam Oil Co. v. ITO35 citing92 ITR 519 · 1973 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES, JAIPUR
Before: Smt. Diva Singh, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No.175/JP/16
आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेषित@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू
vihykFkhZ@The Appellant- M/s Morani Fourwheels Pvt. Ltd. Jaipur. 1. izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent- The ACIT, Circle-6, Jaipur 2. vk;dj vk;qDr@ CIT 3. vk;dj vk;qDr¼vihy½@The CIT(A) 4. विभागीय प्रतिनिधि] आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर@क्त्ए प्ज्Aज्ए 5. 6. xkMZ QkbZy@ Guard File (ITA No.175/JP/2016)
vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,
सहायक पंजीकार@ Aेेपेजंदज. त्महपेजतंत.
More judgments on Section 40A(3)
- Rekha Agarwal, Jaipur vs ITO WD 4(1), JaipurITA 844/JPR/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Infra Developers, Shivpuri vs Income Tax Officer, AshoknagarITA 454/AGR/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Saiyed Zaharul Alam, Murshidabad vs I.T.O., Ward - 42(1), MurshidabadITA 2233/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- M/S Sadana Electric Store, Lucknow vs DCIT Range-6, LucknowITA 283/LKW/2024[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Nagendra Prasad, Patna vs ITO Ward -5(3) Patna, Dak BanglowITA 362/PAT/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026