DCIT-13(1)(1), MUMBAI vs. M/S ORACLE FINANCIAL SERVICES SOFTWARE LTD., MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal followed its earlier decision for AY 2006-07, accepting the assessee's benchmarking approach and treating the assessee as the tested party. The disallowance under Section 14A was also contested.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Oracle Financial Services Software Limited, is in appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2008-09. The dispute involves disallowance under Section 14A and transfer pricing adjustments related to international transactions with overseas subsidiaries.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in upholding disallowance under Section 14A and in the transfer pricing adjustment by not accepting the assessee as the tested party. Also, whether training income and telecommunication expenses should be considered for Section 10A deduction.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Coca Cola Inc. v. ACIT43 citing309 ITR 194 · 2009 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “J” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SMT. BEENA PILLAI & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL
Per Smt. Beena Pillai, JM: The present cross-appeals arise out of the order dated 01/03/2019 passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-57 (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(A”)] for A.Y. 2008-09 on the following grounds of appeal:-
The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:- "GROUNDS OF APPEAL The grounds of appeals (including sub-grounds)
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026