NUVAMA WEALTH MANAGEMENT LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the AO had recorded sufficient dissatisfaction to invoke Section 14A and Rule 8D. The disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) should be computed considering only investments that yielded exempt income.
What were the facts?
The assessee, engaged in share broking and investment, made a suo motu disallowance under Section 14A. The Assessing Officer (AO) found this inadequate and computed a higher disallowance. The CIT(A) restricted the disallowance to the extent of exempt income.
What were the issues?
Whether the AO recorded sufficient dissatisfaction to invoke Section 14A and Rule 8D, and how the disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) should be computed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(11)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Cheminvest Ltd. v. CIT1,569 citing378 ITR 33 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Corrtech Energy (P.) Ltd.579 citing372 ITR 97 · 2014 · HC
- CIT v. Chettinad Logistics (P) Ltd.444 citing80 Taxmann.com 221 · 2017 · HC
- CIT v. Chettinad Logistics (P.) Ltd.421 citing95 Taxmann.com 250 · 2018 · SC
- CIT v. Winsome Textile Industries Ltd.378 citing319 ITR 204 · 2009 · HC
- Redington (India) Ltd. v. Addl. CIT370 citing77 Taxmann.com 257 · 2017 · HC
- CIT v. Abhishek Industries Ltd.359 citing286 ITR 1 · 2006 · HC
- PCIT v. State Bank of Patiala228 citing393 ITR 476 · 2017 · HC · Read judgment
- Sajjan India Ltd. v. ACIT39 citing89 Taxmann.com 21 · 2018 · ITAT
- 4 citing
- DCIT v. Bombay Oxygen Corporation Ltd.3 citing86 Taxmann 88 · 2017 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “B” MUMBAI
Before: SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT (ACCOUNT MEMBER) & MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL
PER OM PRAKASH KANT, AM These two appeals by the assessee are directed against two separate orders, both dated 20th August, 2025 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) 47, Mumbai [in short, “the Ld. CIT(A)] for assessment years 2014-15 and 2015-16 respectively.
In both these appeals, identical issue in dispute of disallowance u/s 14A of the Act is involved and, therefore, both these appeals were heard together and disposed off by way of this consolidated order for the sake of convenience.
Now, we take up the appeal of the assessee for
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026