DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - CENTRAL CIRCLE 8(1), MUMBAI vs. S. B. SECURITIES PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition, finding that the Assessing Officer had made adverse conclusions without sufficient material. The Tribunal noted that clients did not disown transactions, disclosed profits, and paid taxes, supporting the assessee's claim of genuine transactions.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the deletion of an addition of Rs. 1,66,28,626/- made on account of alleged suppression of profit and obtaining fictitious loss through client code modification (CCM) in commodity transactions. The assessee, a stock broker, claimed these modifications were due to punching errors and genuine mistakes.
What were the issues?
Whether client code modifications in commodity transactions were genuine errors or a scheme to evade taxes, and if the addition made by the AO was based on sufficient evidence.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Jansampark Advertising & Marketing (P.) Ltd.196 citing56 Taxmann.com 286 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
- Pr.CIT v. India Finance Ltd.3 citing81 Taxmann.com 135 · 2017 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “G” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
आदेश की �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ�/ The Appellant 1. ��थ�/ The Respondent 2.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026