Pr.CIT v. India Finance Ltd.

81 Taxmann.com 135High Court2017#25845 most cited
3

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2023.

Judgments citing Pr.CIT v. India Finance Ltd.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-8(1), MUMBAI vs. VIPUL D. SHAH, MUMBAI

Appeal stands dismissed

ITA 5688/MUM/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Jul 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Jm & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपील सं./ I.T.A. No.5688/Mum/2017 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year:2010-11) Dcit-Central Circle -8(1) Shri Vipul D. Shah Room No.656, 6Th Floor 1303, Imperial Residency बनाम नाम/ नाम नाम Aaykar Bhavan, M.K. Road Gulmohar, Cross Road No.12, Vs. Mumbai-400 020 Jvpd, Near Juhu Circle & Axis Bank Parle (W), Mumbai-400 056. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaups-0598-M (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (ू"यथ" / Respondent) : & Cross Objection No.350/Mum/2018 Arising Out Of I.T.A. No.5688/Mum/2017 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year:2010-11) Shri Vipul D. Shah Dcit-Central Circle -8(1) Room No.656, 6Th Floor 1303, Imperial Residency बनाम नाम/ नाम नाम Gulmohar, Cross Road No.12, Aaykar Bhavan, M.K. Road Vs. Jvpd, Near Juhu Circle & Axis Bank Mumbai-400 020 Parle (W), Mumbai-400 056. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaups-0598-M (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (ू"यथ" / Respondent) :

For Appellant: Dr. K. Shivaram and Rahul Hakani – Ld. ARsFor Respondent: Chaudhary Arun Kumar Singh-Ld. DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 148

…nd of Ld. AO, submitted that the assessee failed to establish the genuineness of the transactions and therefore the additions were justified. Reliance has been placed on the decision of Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta rendered in Pr.CIT V/s India Finance Ltd. [81 Taxmann.com 135] & Hon’ble Delhi High Court rendered in CIT V/s Vashishth Chay Vyapar Ltd. [66 Taxmann.com 371]. The Ld. DR also justified the validity of reassessment proceedings in view of the fact that Ld. AO was in receipt of tangible information which, prima-facie, indicated escapement of income. 4.2 The Ld. Sr. Counsel, Dr.K.Shivram, controverting t…

Pr.CIT v. India Finance Ltd. (81 Taxmann.com 135) — Cited in 3 Judgments | BharatTax