TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED (TAGIC),MUMBAI vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME-TAX DEPARTMENT, ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME-TAX DEPARTMENT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeals and dismissed the revenue's appeals for the most part. The tribunal followed its own previous decisions and binding precedents to decide various issues, including deductions for reserves, capital gains exemption, classification of investment profits, and disallowances related to reinsurance, claims, and other expenses.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a general insurance company, contested various additions and disallowances made by the Assessing Officer (AO) and partially upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]. Both the assessee and the revenue filed appeals before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) concerning assessment years 2018-19 and 2020-21.
What were the issues?
The core issues revolve around the allowability of various deductions and exemptions claimed by the general insurance company, including reserves for unexpired risks, long-term capital gains, and the classification of investment profits, as well as disallowances made by the revenue authorities.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 250,Section 143(3),Section 260,Section 144B,Section 10(38),Section 111A,Section 112,Section 234A,Section 234B,Section 234D,Section 139(1),Section 40(a)(ia),Section 43B,Section 32,Section 10(34),Section 10(15)(iv)(h),Section 14A,Section 6E
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “E”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE & SHRI JAGADISH
Heard together (4 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
2 ITA No.1432, 1450, 2398 & 2403/Mum/2024 TATA AIG General Insurance Company Ltd.
Per Bench : A bunch of appeal filed by the assessee and revenue against the order of the Ld
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 260
- Kuldip Kohi, West Delhi vs ITO Ward 45(1), DelhiITA 7358/DEL/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Birla Furukawa Fibre Optics Private… vs Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income…ITA 178/PAN/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed7 Aug 2026AY 2021-22
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Pratyaksh Apparels Private Limited, DelhiITA 8054/DEL/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Jul 2026AY 2016-17
- Syds Hotels & Resorts Private Limited, Delhi vs ITO, Ward 22(4), DelhiITA 1782/DEL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed10 Jul 2026AY 2012-13
- Rani Promoter Private Limited, Delhi vs Jao, DelhiITA 1628/DEL/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed8 Jul 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026