ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 17, NEW DELHI vs. SDB INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the departmental appeal was not maintainable as it was filed against the CBDT's instructions regarding the monetary limit for appeals. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the deletion of an addition made under Section 14A. The tax effect in the appeal was below Rs. 20 lakhs, which is the monetary limit for filing appeals as per CBDT Circular No. 3 of 2018.
What were the issues?
Whether a departmental appeal is maintainable when the tax effect is below the prescribed monetary limit set by the CBDT, and if such appeals should be withdrawn or not pressed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES “G” : DELHI
Before: SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M. & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, A.M.
For Revenue : -None- For Assessee : Shri Baldev Raj, C.A. Date of Hearing : 26.10.2018 Date of Pronouncement : 01.11.2018 ORDER PER BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M.
This appeal by Revenue has been directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-27, New Delhi, Dated 09.03.2018, for the A.Y. 2014-2015, challenging the deletion of addition of Rs.48,53,405/- on account of disallowance under section 14A of the I.T. Act, 1961.
2 ITA.No.4011/Del./2018 M/s. SDB Infrastructure (P) Ltd., New Delhi.
The assessee moved an application for early hearing of the appeal because the tax effect in the Departmental Appeal is below Rs.20 lakhs. However, none appeared on behalf of the Revenue. The claim of assessee is that the tax effect is below Rs.20 lakhs have not been disputed.
Admittedly, the tax effect in the Departmental Appeal is less than Rs.20 lakhs. Vide Circular No. 3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 issued by CBDT under section 268A of the I.T. Act, it has been directed that Department shall not file appeal before the Tribunal in case where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limit of Rs.20 lakhs. It is also directed that this instruction will apply retrospectively to the pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in the Tribunal. Pending appeals below the specified tax effect may be withdrawn/not pressed. We may also note that the Appeal of the Department above would not fall within the exceptions provided in the Board Circular. In the result, the Departmental Appeal is not maintainable as have been filed
3 ITA.No.4011/Del./2018 M/s. SDB Infrastructure (P) Ltd., New Delhi. against the instruction of the Board. The Departmental Appeal is dismissed.
In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open Court.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026