PTC INDIA LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 19 (1), DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the issue of Section 14A disallowance was recurring and reiterated past remand directions for re-computation. For the surcharge issue, the Tribunal held that surcharge on delayed payments, if not paid or recovered and is disputable, is not taxable as it does not represent real income, even if an entry is made in books. The Tribunal followed previous decisions, including High Court judgments, and directed the Assessing Officer to delete the additions but consider the claim for taxability when surcharge is realized and offered as income.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal challenged the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D. The Revenue's appeal challenged the deletion of additions made on account of surcharge on delayed payments from debtors. Both parties agreed that the issue of Section 14A disallowance was recurring, and a prior order directed re-computation. The Revenue's appeal concerning surcharge was based on the Assessing Officer's view that it was taxable as income when levied, irrespective of payment. The assessee contended it was not taxable until realized.
What were the issues?
Whether the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D is sustainable, and whether surcharge on delayed payments, not yet realized, is taxable as income.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 14A,Section 143(3),Section 250,Section 229 ITR 383 (SC)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘E NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARAAND
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM These assessee's and Revenue's cross appeals ITA Nos.1186/Del/2024 and 2858/Del/2024 for assessment year 2020-21, arise against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026