Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY
आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, ‘डी’ �यायपीठ, चे�नई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , ‘D’ BENCH, CHENNAI �ी इंटूर� रामा राव, लेखा सद�य एवं �ी धु�वु� आर.एल रे�डी,�याियक सद�य के सम� BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos.2086 & 2087/Chny/2019 (�नधा�रण वष� / Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2015-16) Vs M/s. The Income Tax Officer Hindustan Chamber of (Exemptions), Commerce, Ward 1, Chennai – 34. Greams Dugar, 5th Floor South Wing, No.149, Greams Road, Chennai – 600 006. PAN : AAACH 2185E (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) (��यथ�/Respondent) अपीलाथ� क� ओर से/ Appellant by : Ms. R. Anitha, JCIT ��यथ� क� ओर से/Respondent by : Shri B. Gowthaman, CA
सुनवाई क� तार�ख/Date of hearing : 06.02.2020 घोषणा क� तार�ख /Date of Pronouncement : 13.02.2020 आदेश /O R D E R PER INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
These appeals filed by the Revenue are directed against the common order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 9,Chennai, (in short ‘CIT(A)’) dated 20.03.2019 for the Assessment Years 2013-14 & 2015-16.
2 I.T.A. Nos. 2086 & 2087/Chny/2019 2. The brief facts of the case are the respondent assessee namely M/s. Hindustan Chamber of Commerce is a company registered U/s.25 of the Companies Act. It was enjoying the registration U/s.12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’). Subsequently, it was cancelled by the DIT(Exemption), Chennai and this cancellation of registration was quashed by this Tribunal vide order dated 23.07.2017 in ITA No.670/Mds/2017. At the time of completion of assessment proceedings, the assessee was not enjoying registration U/s.12AA of the Act. Consequently, the AO brought to tax the excess of income over expenditure and the Long Term Capital Gains on sale of the property and accordingly completed the assessment vide order dated 21.03.2016 for the assessment year 2013-14 and vide order dated 21.12.2017 for the assessment year 2015-16. Being aggrieved, by the above assessment orders, appeals was preferred before the CIT(A), who vide impugned order taking into consideration the order passed by the Tribunal restoring the registration U/s.12AA of the Act and allowed the appeals of the assessee by holding that once the assessee makes fixed deposit out of the sale proceeds of the asset, it amounts to application of income of charitable trust.
3 I.T.A. Nos. 2086 & 2087/Chny/2019 3. Being aggrieved, the Revenue is in appeal before us challenging the correctness of the decision of the CIT(A). It is submitted that the AO had no occasion to examine the applicability of proviso to Section 2(15) of the Act and the CIT(A) ought not have granted the relief.
On the other hand, the Ld.AR submitted that placing a fixed deposit against the sale proceeds of asset amounts to acquisition of another capital asset which is nothing but an application of income. He placed reliance on the CBDT Circular Instruction No.883 dated 24.09.1975 and also decision of the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of CIT vs. Ambalal Sarabhai Trust No.3, 173 ITR 683.
We heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The only issue involved in the present appeal is whether investment of fixed deposit in bank out of the sale proceeds of asset, could be regarded as the application of income or not. This issue was clarified by the Board vide Instruction No.883 dated 24.09.1975:- “The Board had occasion to examine whether investment of the net consideration in fixed deposit with a bank would be regarded as utilization of the amount of the net consideration for acquiring another capital asset within the meaning of section11(1A0 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Board has been advised that investment of the net consideration in fixed deposit with a bank
4 I.T.A. Nos. 2086 & 2087/Chny/2019 for a period of 6 months or above would be regarded as utilization of the net consideration for acquisition of another capital asset within the meaning of section 11(1A).”
This board circular was followed by the Hon’ble Kolkata High Court in the case of CIT v. Hindustan Welfare Trusts, 70 taxman 93 and CIT v. East India Charitable Trust, 73 taxman 880 and the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of CIT vs. Ambalal Sarabhai Trust No.3, 173 ITR 683. Since the decision of the Ld.CIT(A) is in consonance with the settled position of law, we do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the Ld.CIT(A). Accordingly the appeals filed by the Revenue stand dismissed.
In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed.
Order pronounced in the court on 13th February, 2020 at Chennai.
Sd/- Sd/- (धु�वु� आर एल रे�डी) (इंटूर� रामा राव) (Duvvuru R.L Reddy) (Inturi Rama Rao) �या�यक सद�य/Judicial Member लेखा सद�य /Accountant Member चे�ई/Chennai, �दनांक/Dated, the 13th February, 2020. RSR आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/Copy to: 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant 2. ��यथ�/Respondent 3. आयकर आयु�त (अपील)/CIT(A) 4. आयकर आयु�त/CIT 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध/DR 6. गाड� फाईल/GF