BENTLEY SYSTEMS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 4(2), DELHI ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the final assessment order was barred by limitation as per Section 153 read with Section 144C of the Act. The assessment order was quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee challenged the final assessment order, contending it was time-barred. The revenue argued that the issue of limitation was pending before the Supreme Court and sought deferral.
What were the issues?
Whether the final assessment order was passed within the time limit prescribed under Section 153 read with Section 144C of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(14)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- 21. In SB Gurbaksh Singh v. Union of India318 citing37 STC 425 · 2007
- 267 citing
- CIT v. Godavari Devi Saraf235 citing113 ITR 589 · 1978 · HC
- (i) Sultana Begum v. Prem Chand Jain187 citing1 SCC 373 · 1997
- State of Punjab v. Bhatinda District Coop. Milk Producers Union Ltd.140 citing11 SCC 363 · 2007
- (ii) CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers131 citing3 SCC 57 · 2003
- CIT v. S. Teja Singh129 citing35 ITR 408 · 1959 · SC · Read judgment
- R.S. Raghunath v. State of Karnataka128 citing1 SCC 335 · 1992
- (ii) Govt. of India v. Citedal Fine Pharmaceuticals116 citing3 SCC 483 · 1989
- 99 citing
- Bharat Steel Tubes Ltd. v. State of Haryana98 citing3 SCC 478 · 1988
- 2021 SCC OnLine SC 8896 citing2021 SCC OnLine SC 88 · 2021
- Tej International Pvt Ltd. v. DCIT (90 citing69 TTJ 650 · 2000 · ITAT
- Tej International Pvt Ltd. v. DCIT64 citing118 Taxmann 59 · 2001 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI
PER YOGESH KUMAR, U.S. JM: The captioned appeal is filed by the Assessee challenging the Final
Assessment Order passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13)r.w. Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act in short) dated 29/07/2024 pertaining
to the Assessment Year 2020-21. 2. The Assessee raised Additional Ground No. 15 contending that the Final Assessment order dated 29/07/2024passed by the A.O. is time
barred by limitation and is bad in law, as it has been passed beyond the time fr
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144C
- Mishoo Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 19/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 18/KOL/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2016-2017
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 17/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 16/KOL/2026[2014-2015]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-2015
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 15/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- S.T.Promotors vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026