(ii) Govt. of India v. Citedal Fine Pharmaceuticals
3 SCC 483Reported decision1989#909 most cited
What is (ii) Govt. of India v. Citedal Fine Pharmaceuticals authority for?
The absence of a specific limitation period for recovery of duty or tax does not, by itself, render a rule arbitrary or unconstitutional under Article 14, provided authorities act with expedition and adhere to principles of natural justice.
116
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2026.
Also referred to as
Govt. of India v. Citedal Fine Pharmaceuticals · 3 SCC 483 · Section 144C · Section 153 · absence of limitation for recovery · Article 14 · arbitrary recovery · natural justice · expedition · reasonable haste
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing (ii) Govt. of India v. Citedal Fine Pharmaceuticals
Showing 1–20 of 116 · Page 1 of 6