MIH INTERNET SEA PTE LTD,SINGAPORE vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 2(2)(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI

ITA 1683/DEL/2023Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 January 2026AY 2017-18Bench: YOGESH KUMAR U.S. (Judicial Member), SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)1 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the assessment order was barred by limitation as per Section 153 read with Section 144C of the Act. The impugned final assessment order was quashed.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal challenged the final assessment order, contending it was time-barred. The assessment order was passed beyond the time frame prescribed under Section 153 read with Section 153(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

What were the issues?

Whether the final assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer was time-barred, considering the interplay between Section 144C and Section 153 of the Income Tax Act.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 153,Section 143(3),Section 144C(13),Section 153(1),Section 153(4)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(10)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI

For Appellant: Adv (Virtual, Ms, Adv & Ms. Shruti Khimta
Hearing: 29/01/2026Pronounced: 30/01/2026

PER YOGESH KUMAR, U.S. JM: The captioned appeal is filed by the Assessee challenging the Final Assessment Order passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act in short) dated 27/04/2023 pertaining

to the Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. The Assessee raised Ground No. 1.5 contending that the Final

Assessment order dated 27/04/2023 passed by the A.O. is time

barred by limitation and is bad in law, as it has been passed beyond

the time frame prescribed under section 153(1) read with section 1

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 153

All 1,265 judgments and leading authorities on Section 153 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →