HEADSTRONG SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 10(1) , NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the final assessment order was barred by limitation as it was passed beyond the prescribed time limits under Section 153 read with Section 144C of the Act. Consequently, the impugned order was quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee challenged the final assessment order, arguing it was time-barred. The assessment order was passed beyond the statutory time limit prescribed under Section 153 read with Section 144C of the Income Tax Act.
What were the issues?
Whether the final assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer was barred by limitation as per the provisions of Section 153 read with Section 144C of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(10)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- 21. In SB Gurbaksh Singh v. Union of India318 citing37 STC 425 · 2007
- (i) Sultana Begum v. Prem Chand Jain187 citing1 SCC 373 · 1997
- State of Punjab v. Bhatinda District Coop. Milk Producers Union Ltd.140 citing11 SCC 363 · 2007
- (ii) CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers131 citing2002 SCC OnLine SC 1226 · 2003
- CIT v. S. Teja Singh129 citing35 ITR 408 · 1959 · SC · Read judgment
- R.S. Raghunath v. State of Karnataka128 citing1 SCC 335 · 1992
- (ii) Govt. of India v. Citedal Fine Pharmaceuticals116 citing3 SCC 483 · 1989
- 99 citing
- Bharat Steel Tubes Ltd. v. State of Haryana98 citing3 SCC 478 · 1988
- 2021 SCC OnLine SC 8896 citing2021 SCC OnLine SC 88 · 2021
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI
PER YOGESH KUMAR, U.S. JM: The captioned appeal is filed by the Assessee challenging the Final
Assessment Order passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) of the Income Tax
Act, 1961 (the Act in short) dated 31/07/2022 pertaining to the Assessment Year 2018-19. 2. The Assessee raised Ground No. 1 contending that the Final
Assessment order dated 31/07/2022 passed by the A.O. is time barred
by limitation and is bad in law, as it has been passed beyond the time
frame prescribed under section 153(1) read with section 153(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short). The Ld. Assessee's Representative
relying on the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble High Court of Madras in the 2 Head
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 3228/MUM/2023[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Zabuben Mepabhai Bharvad, Ahmedabad vs The PCIT - 1, AhmedabadITA 1233/AHD/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment… vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 3453/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026