JINDAL PIPES LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-20, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that all issues raised in the present appeals were covered by its own earlier decisions in the assessee's own case for assessment years 2016-17 and 2018-19. Based on these precedents, the Tribunal upheld the deletion of disallowance for power and fuel expenses and the restriction of disallowance under Section 14A to the extent of exempt income. Similarly, the disallowance for technical services fees was also found to be unsustainable.
What were the facts?
The assessee and the Revenue filed cross-appeals against the CIT(A)'s order concerning assessment year 2020-21. The primary disputes revolved around disallowances made by the Assessing Officer (AO) for fees for technical services and under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Revenue also appealed the deletion of a disallowance concerning power and fuel expenses.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowances for technical services and under Section 14A are justified, and whether the deletion of disallowance for power and fuel expenses by the CIT(A) was correct, in light of previous ITAT rulings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Joint Investments Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT803 citing372 ITR 694 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH, ‘C’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA & SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER KRINWANT SAHAY, AM: Appeals in these cases have been filed by the assessee as well as by the Revenue arising out of the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-27, New Delhi, dated 17.10.2023 against the assessment order dated 2
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 37(1)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Smit Navnitlal Soni, Ahmedabad, Gujarat vs ITO Ward-5(3)(1), Ahmedabad, GujaratITA 1434/AHD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shobha Sudamrao Tagad, Ahmednagar vs ITO WD-1, AhmednagarITA 311/PUN/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Digjam Limited, Jamnagar vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 349/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 839/IND/2025[2023-2024]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2023-2024
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026