ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. UNCLE NEPHEW IMPEX PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 6202/DEL/2014Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 April 2019AY 2005-066 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal recalled its earlier order and heard the appeal. Upon review, it was found that the tax effect was below the revised monetary limit of Rs. 20,00,000/- as per CBDT Circular No. 3/2018, which has retrospective effect.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed a miscellaneous application to recall an earlier order dismissing their appeal. The grounds for recall were that the tax effect in the appeal exceeded the monetary limit for filing appeals as per CBDT Circular No. 21/2015.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue was maintainable given the low tax effect in light of the retrospective CBDT circulars on monetary limits for appeals.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 254(2),Section 253(4),Section 268A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘FRIDAY’ : NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI H.S. SIDHU & SHRI O.P. KANT

Heard together (2 matters)

MA No.242/Del/2016
ITA No.6202/Del/2014

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

sought for recalling the order dated 18.12.2015 passed in for AY 2005-06 on the grounds inter alia that from the perusal of the record, it is noticed that the tax effect involved in this case exceeds the prescribed monetary limit as per CBDT Circular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015 for filing the appeal before the Tribunal; that order of dismissal passed in this case may be recalled and appeal be listed for fresh hearing.

2.

We have heard the ld. DR for the Applicant/Revenue and ld. AR for the Respondent/Assessee, perused the impugned order passed by the Bench, documents relied upon in the appeals well as case laws relied upon by the parties for the purpose of disposal of this application.

3.

Bare perusal of the grounds of appeal and order passed by the lower Revenue authorities go to prove that the tax effect in this case exceeds the prescribed monetary limit for filing appeal before the Tribunal and as such is not covered under the CBDT Circular No.21/2015, so we hereby rectify the mistake apparent on record and order dated 18.12.2015 passed in for AY 2005-06 is ordered to be recalled and appeal is heard today i.e. 05.04.2019 itself by the Bench.

4. The Appellant/Revenue by filing the present appeal sought to set aside the impugned order dated 30.9.2014 passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-XXI, New Delhi qua the assessment year 2005-06.

5.

Perusal of the aforesaid appeal filed by the Revenue apparently show that the same is having low tax effect as per CBDT Circular No.3/2018 dated 11th July, 2018 vide which the Revenue has been directed not to prefer any appeal in case the tax effect is less than Rs.20,00,000/- and this factual position has been fairly conceded by the Ld. D.R. The Ld. A.R. contended that the appeal of the Revenue may be dismissed in the light of CBDT Circular (supra).

6.

We have heard the parties on the issue in controversy and perused the material on record. Perusal of CBDT Circular (supra) shows that monetary limit for filing the appeal by the Department before the Tribunal, Hon'ble High Court and Hon'ble Supreme Court has been revised and the relevant portion of the aforesaid circular is extracted as under:

“Subject: Revision of monetary limits for filing of appeals by the Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts and SLPs/appeals before Supreme Court-measures for reducing litigation-Reg. Reference is invited to Board’s Circular No. 21 of 2015 dated 10.12.2015 wherein monetary limits and other conditions for filing departmental appeals (in Income-tax matters) before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts and SLPs/ appeals before Supreme Court were specified.

2. In supersession of the above Circular, it has been decided by the Board that departmental appeals may be filed on merits before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and High Courts and SLPs/ appeals before Supreme Court keeping in view the monetary limits and conditions specified below.

3. Henceforth, appeals/ SLPs shall not be filed in cases where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limits given hereunder:

Appeals/SLPs in Income-tax Monetary S. No. matters Limit (in Rs) 1 Before Appellate Tribunal 20,00,000/- 2 Before High Court 50,00,000/- 3 Before Supreme Court 1,00,00,000/- It is clarified that an appeal should not be filed merely because the tax effect in a case exceeds the monetary limits prescribed above. Filing of appeal in such cases is to be decided on merits of the case. …… 12. It is clarified that the monetary limit of Rs. 20 lakhs for filing appeals before the ITAT would apply equally to cross objections under section 253(4) of the Act. Cross objections below this monetary limit, already filed, should be pursued for dismissal as withdrawn/ not pressed. Filing of cross objections below the monetary limit may not be considered henceforth. Similarly, references to High Courts and SLPs/ appeals before Supreme Court below the monetary limit of Rs. 50 lakhs and Rs. 1 Crore respectively should be pursued for dismissal as withdrawn/ not pressed. References before High Court and SLPs/ appeals below these limits may not be considered henceforth.

13.

This Circular will apply to SLPs/ appeals/ cross objections/ references to be filed henceforth in SC/HCs/Tribunal and it shall also apply retrospectively to pending SLPs/ appeals/ cross objections/references. Pending appeals below the specified tax limits in pare 3 above may be withdrawn/ not pressed.

14.

The above may be brought to the notice of all concerned.

15.

This issues under Section 268A of the Income-tax Act 1961……”

7.

In view of the CBDT Circular No.3/2018 dated 11.07.2018 having retrospective effect and what has been discussed above, we are of the considered view that the aforesaid appeal is not maintainable because of low tax effect i.e. less than Rs.20,00,000/- hence, the aforesaid appeal filed by the Revenue is hereby dismissed having been become infructuous. However, in case, the present appeal is found to be covered by the revised guidelines issued by the CBDT vide letter F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ (Pt) dated 20th August, 2018, the Department shall be at liberty to seek recall of this order under relevant provisions of law. Order pronounced in open court on this 05TH April, 2019.

More judgments on Section 268A

All 3,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 268A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →