NATTIKA SERVICE CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO R 308,NATTIKA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, GURUVAYUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
Following the Jurisdictional High Court's decision in PCIT v. Peroorkada Service Co-op. Bank Ltd., the Tribunal held that interest income earned from District/State Co-operative Banks by a co-operative society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act is indeed eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. Therefore, the assessee was entitled to the claimed deduction.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a primary agricultural co-operative society, claimed a deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) for its gross income. The Assessing Officer disallowed a portion of this deduction, specifically for interest income of Rs. 14,83,083/- received from co-operative banks, holding it was not eligible under Section 80P(2)(d), which was subsequently confirmed by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether interest income derived by a primary agricultural co-operative society from deposits with co-operative banks qualifies for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 80P,Section 80P(2)(a)(i),Section 80P(2)(d),Section 147,Section 254,Section 144B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- PCIT v. Peroorkada Service Co-op. Bank Ltd.208 citing442 ITR 141 · 2022 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM
O R D E R These appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the orders of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 19.09.2024 for Assessment Years (AYs) 2009-10, 2013-14 & 2015-16.
Since identical issues are involved, these appeals are 2. heard together and disposed of vide this common order. For the sake convenience and clarity, I shall advert to the facts of AY 2009- 10 and the findings for 2009-19 will mutatis mutandis apply to the other assessment years.
The appellant is a primary agricultural co-operative society. The return of income for AY 2009-10 was filed on 2 930 & 932/Coch/2024 Nattika Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. 21.11.2016 claiming deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of its entire gross income of Rs. 12,75,604/-. Against the said return of income the assessment was completed by the Income Tax Officer, Guruvayur (hereinafter called "the AO") vide order dated 22.03,2022 passed u/s. 147 r.w.s. 254 r.w.s. 144B of the Act disallowing the claim of deduction u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Act holding that the interest earned from co-operative banks amounting to Rs. 14,83,083/- does not qualify for deduction u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Act.
Being aggrieved, an appeal was filed before the CIT(A), who vide the impugned order confirmed the action of the AO.
Being aggrieved, the appellant is in appeal before the Tribunal in the present appeal.
I heard the rival contentions of both the parties and perused the material available on record. I notice that the issue related to interest income received from the District Co-operative bank stands adjudicated by Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court’s decision in the case of PCIT v. Peroorkada Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. [2022] 442 ITR 141 (Ker) wherein their Lordships have rejected the Revenue’s identical stand as under: - “12.2 Section 80P deals with Co-operative Societies' computation of income. As already noted, it has four sections and several sub-sections and clauses. The Parliament has considered the various situations in which the exigible income and the deductable income of the assessee is considered while computing the income of the assessee. For getting deduction, in our considered view, the assessee must also establish that the interest income earned by the assessee is from a Co-operative Society. As a matter of fact, in the case on hand, there is no dispute that it is not from a Co-operative Society registered under Kerala Co-operative Societies Act. The interest income 3 930 & 932/Coch/2024 Nattika Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. earned from District Co-operative Bank/State Co-operative Bank, in the facts and circumstances of the case, do come within Section 80P(2)(d). Therefore, the income constitutes income from other sources and the only eligible deduction is covered by Section 80P(2)(d) viz. Interest or dividend derived by the assessee from its investments with any other Co-operative Society. The source of interest income is from Bank and Treasury, interest income received from Treasury be included in the computation of total income of the assessee. In other words, interest earned from Treasury is inadmissible for deduction and interest income from Co-operative Societies registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act are eligible for deduction. The contra consideration of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal is incorrect and liable to be modified as stated above. Hence, it is held that the interest income earned by the assessee does not come within the ambit of Section 80P(2)(a)(i) and permissible deduction of interest income is limited to Co-operative Societies/Banks registered under Kerala Co-operative Societies Act under clause (d) of the Act and effect order on the above lines is made by the Assessing Officer. The questions are accordingly answered.”
Respectfully following the above decision of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court, I hold that the assessee is entitled for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act on account of interest received from co-operative banks.
The above discussions and finding shall mutatis mutandis apply to the appeals for AYs 2013-14 & 2015-16.
In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed.
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Arun Aloysius Barnes vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 14 Oct 2026
- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026