ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(4), CHENNAI vs. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, CHENNAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeals. However, it dismissed the appeals as not maintainable due to the tax effect being less than Rs. 50 lakhs, as per CBDT Circular No. 17 of 2019.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed three appeals before the ITAT, which were found to be time-barred by six days. The Revenue sought condonation of the delay, citing administrative reasons.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeals should be condoned and whether the appeals are maintainable given the tax effect and CBDT circulars.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI V.DURGA RAO & SHRI G.MANJUNATHA
आदेश / O R D E R
PER G.MANJUNATHA, AM: These three appeals filed by the Revenue are directed against common order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-19, Chennai dated 17.04.2017 and pertain to assessment years 2007-08, 2006-07 & 2009-10 respectively.
At the outset, learned DR submitted that the appeals filed by the Revenue are time barred by six days for which necessary petition for condonation of delay along with affidavit explaining the reasons for the delay has been filed. The DR further submitted that the Revenue could not file appeals within the time allowed under the Act due to delay in movement of files. The delay in filing appeals is neither intentional nor willful but for the unavoidable reasons, therefore, delay may be condoned in the interest of advancement of substantial justice. The learned AR has no objection to condone the delay. Having considered the petition and affidavit filed by the Department for condonation of delay, we are of the considered view that reasons given by the Revenue for not filing the appeals within the time allowed under the Act comes under reasonable cause as provided under the Act for condonation of delay and hence, delay in filing of appeal is condoned and appeals filed by the assessee are admitted for adjudication.
It is stated before us that the tax effect in the above appeals is less than Rs. 50 lakhs and therefore, the Circular No. 17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in exercise of its power vested under section 268A(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 comes into play wherein, the monetary limit for filing the appeal by the Revenue before the ITAT and various High Courts as well as Apex Court are revised with an object of the reducing the tax litigation. In the said circular, it is stated that in cases where the tax effect in the appeals to be filed before the Appellate Tribunal does not exceed Rs. 50 lakhs appeals should not be filed. Thus, taking note of CBDT Circular No. 17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 and considering the fact that the tax effect in the instant appeals is less than Rs. 50 lakhs, the present appeals deserves to be dismissed as not pressed / not maintainable. However, we make it clear that the issues raised in the instant appeals is left open to be examined in the appropriate proceedings, if arises, in future. At the same time, we also make it clear that if the appeals fall in any of the exceptions referred to in the above said CBDT Circular, the Revenue is at liberty to move an application for recalling the order if so advised. Accordingly, in the light of CBDT circular No. 17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019, all the three appeals stand dismissed.
In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue for the relevant assessment years are dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 2nd December, 2020
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026