URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST (NOW KOTA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY),KOTA vs. DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE, JAIPUR, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT held that the Urban Improvement Trust is an instrumentality of the State and falls under the purview of Article 289(1) of the Constitution of India. Consequently, its income is not chargeable under the Income Tax Act.
What were the facts?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) heard appeals concerning the taxability of income earned by the Urban Improvement Trust (UIT), Kota. The revenue contended that UIT's income was taxable, while UIT argued for its exemption.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the income of the Urban Improvement Trust was exempt from income tax as income of a State under Article 289(1) of the Constitution, or if it was taxable under specific provisions of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation v. ITO69 citing52 ITR 524 · 1964 · SC · Read judgment
- Smt. Sapna Sanjay Raisoni v. ITO14 citing70 Taxmann.com 7 · 2016
- 6 citing
- ITO v. Urban Improvement Trust4 citing409 ITR 1 · 2018 · SC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCH “B”, JAIPUR
Before: Dr. S. SEETHALAKSHMI & SHRI GAGAN GOYAL
PER GAGAN GOYAL, A.M:
These appeals by assessee and revenue are directed against the order of NFAC, Delhi dated 22.03.2024
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(46)
- Seepz Special Economic Zone Authority… vs Exem. Circle 2, MumbaiITA 4134/MUM/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Seepz Special Economic Zone Authority… vs Exem. Circle 2, MumbaiITA 4133/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed20 Aug 2026AY 2013-14
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Mahagun (India) Private Limited, New DelhiITA 381/DEL/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed18 Aug 2026AY 2013-14
- Delhi State Industrial & Infrastructure… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 8873/DEL/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2026AY 2022-23
- Delhi State Industrial & Infrastructure… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 8872/DEL/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026