DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-75(1), DELHI, INCOME TAX OFFICE LAXMI NAGAR vs. MAHAGUN (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee cannot be treated as an assessee in default for non-deduction of TDS on lease rent paid to GNOIDA, following previous decisions of the ITAT and the Delhi High Court. The additions made by the AO were rightly deleted by the CIT(A).
What were the facts?
The assessee paid lease rent to Greater NOIDA Industrial Development Authority (GNOIDA) but did not deduct TDS. The AO treated the assessee as an assessee in default and levied tax and interest. The CIT(A) deleted the additions based on a Delhi High Court ruling and a CBDT notification.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is liable for non-deduction of TDS on lease rent paid to a development authority, and whether previous judicial pronouncements and notifications exempt such payments from TDS.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH, ‘C’: NEW DELHI
Before: S RIFAUR RAHMANSUNIL KUMAR SINGH
PER: SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER
This appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 11.09.2025 passed in appeal No CIT(A), Delhi-26/10051/2012- 13 by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “CIT(A) u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) for the A.Y. 2013-14, wherein ld CIT(A) has allowed assessee’s appeal and deleted the addition made u/s 201(1) r.w.s 194I and 201(1A) r.w.s 194I(b) of the Act.
The brief facts of the case are that the appellant assessee, is engaged in the business of real estate and entered into a lease agreement with Greater NOIDA Industrial Development Authority (GNOIDA) on 24.11
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 201(1)
- M/S. Shree Laminators Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 4(4), KolkataITA 1534/KOL/2026[2011-2012]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2011-2012
- Tmw Fintech Private Limited, Mumbai vs Circle 14(1)(2), MumbaiITA 30/MUM/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- State Bank of India, Guna vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, GwaliorITA 432/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- State Bank of India Regional Business… vs Income Tax Officer, TDS Gwalior, GwaliorITA 420/AGR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- State Bank of India, Tikamgarh vs Income Tax Officer, TDS ITO (TDS) Gwalior…ITA 411/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026