ITO, WARD-1(1), NEW DELHI vs. M/S ACB INDIA POWER LTD., NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 4961/DEL/2017Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 August 2019AY 2013-1414 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the Departmental appeals were not maintainable due to the low tax effect, as per CBDT Circulars. Cross objections were either withdrawn or not pressed.

What were the facts?

The Department filed several appeals before the ITAT. The tax effect in these appeals was below the monetary limits prescribed by CBDT circulars for filing appeals.

What were the issues?

Whether departmental appeals are maintainable when the tax effect is below the prescribed monetary limits by CBDT circulars.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 268A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘E’ NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI & SHRI O.P. KANT

Consolidated Appeals (79)

ITA 6988/Del/2018AY 2015-16
ITA 6989/Del/2018AY 2016-17
ITA 7028/Del/2018AY 2009-10
ITA 929/Del/2018AY 2009-10
ITA 5734/Del/2018AY 2013-14
ITA 6166/Del/2018AY 2013-14
ITA 6387/Del/2018AY 2013-14
ITA 6777/Del/2018AY 2015-16
ITA 7062/Del/2018AY 2013-14
ITA 7181/Del/2018AY 2008-09
ITA 4286/Del/2018AY 2013-14
ITA 5811/Del/2018AY 2014-15
ITA 5837/Del/2018AY 2009-10
ITA 6411/Del/2018AY 2011-12
ITA 6534/Del/2018AY 2013-14
ITA 6549/Del/2018AY 2010-11
ITA 6898/Del/2018AY 2015-16
ITA 6944/Del/2018AY 2014-15
ITA 7076/Del/2018AY 2010-11
ITA 7141/Del/2018AY 2012-13
ITA 7152/Del/2018AY 2010-11
ITA 429/Del/2018AY 2013-14
ITA 572/Del/2018AY 2013-14
ITA 573/Del/2018AY 2014-15
ITA 722/Del/2018AY 2014-15
ITA 1653/Del/2018AY 2014-15
ITA 1686/Del/2018AY 2013-14
ITA 1689/Del/2018AY 2014-15
ITA 2307/Del/2018AY 2014-15
ITA 2438/Del/2018AY 2015-16
ITA 2446/Del/2018AY 2013-14
ITA 2456/Del/2018AY 2014-15
ITA 2463/Del/2018AY 2012-13
ITA 2875/Del/2018AY 2012-13
ITA 3000/Del/2018AY 2014-15
ITA 4612/Del/2018AY 2009-10
ITA 4811/Del/2018AY 2013-14
ITA 704/Del/2018AY 2012-13
ITA 709/Del/2018AY 2012-13
ITA 814/Del/2018AY 2013-14
ITA 4615/Del/2018AY 2010-11
ITA 17/Del/2018AY 2007-08
ITA 96/Del/2018AY 2012-13
ITA 259/Del/2018AY 2014-15
ITA 450/Del/2018AY 2009-10
ITA 483/Del/2018AY 2014-15
ITA 1694/Del/2018AY 2014-15
ITA 1696/Del/2018AY 2013-14
ITA 2113/Del/2018AY 2013-14
ITA 2136/Del/2018AY 2014-15
ITA 2274/Del/2018AY 2012-13
ITA 2458/Del/2018AY 2014-15
ITA 2459/Del/2018AY 2013-14
ITA 2589/Del/2018AY 2008-09
ITA 2590/Del/2018AY 2010-11
ITA 2980/Del/2018AY 2011-12
ITA 1433/Del/2017AY 2013-14
ITA 1443/Del/2017AY 2012-13
ITA 1444/Del/2017AY 2012-13
ITA 3385/Del/2018AY 2012-13
ITA 4624/Del/2018AY 2010-11
ITA 4961/Del/2017AY 2013-14
ITA 6976/Del/2018AY 2010-11
ITA 6978/Del/2018AY 2012-13
ITA 7037/Del/2018AY 2001-02
ITA 7069/Del/2018AY 2011-12
ITA 7111/Del/2018AY 2011-12
ITA 7502/Del/2018AY 2015-16
ITA 4758/Del/2018AY 2013-14
ITA 6658/Del/2018AY 2015-16
ITA 7136/Del/2018AY 2015-16
ITA 7548/Del/2018AY 2015-16
ITA 7624/Del/2018AY 2009-10
ITA 7633/Del/2018AY 2007-08
ITA 7810/Del/2018AY 2008-09
ITA 7867/Del/2018AY 2014-15
ITA 7952/Del/2018AY 2015-16
ITA 8139/Del/2018AY 2013-14
ITA 5791/Del/2018AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Ms. Tejasi Jain, CA Gurgaon, Ms. Tejasi Jain, CA Gurgaon, Ms. Tejasi Jain, CA Gurgaon, Adv. Delhi, Ms. Manju Bala, Adv. 6. 5734/Del/2018, Adv. Gurgaon, Adv. (ITA No, Shri P.C. Yadav, Adv. Delhi, Ms. Manju Bala, Adv. AABCK0599G, Smt. None, CA Delhi, CA New Delhi, CA Academy, Ms. Ritika Garg, CA AACCI0734J, Adv. Society, Adv. (ITA No, CA Delhi, CA (ITA No, CA New Delhi, CA 61. 1433/Del/2017, Adv. New Delhi, Adv. 62. 1443/Del/2017, Adv. Moradabad, Adv. 63. 1444/Del/2017, Adv. Moradabad, Adv. 64. 3385/Del/2018, Ms. Tejasvi Jain, CA Gurgaon, Ms. Tejasvi Jain, CA Gurgaon, CA New Delhi, CA 73. 4758/Del/2018, CA PAN :
For Respondent: Shri S.L. Anuragi, Sr. DR
Hearing: 23.08.2019Pronounced: 28.08.2019

PER SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M. We have heard the Ld. D.R. and Learned Counsels for the Assessees who have appeared at the time of hearing of these appeals. Notice was given to the parties through notice board of the Tribunal as well as by providing list of the cases to the Tax Bar Association.

2.

Admittedly, the tax effect in the Departmental Appeals are less than Rs.50 lakhs. Vide Circular No.3/2018 Dated 11thJuly, 2018 issued by CBDT under section 268A of the I.T. Act, it has been directed that the Department shall not file appeal before the Tribunal in case where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limit of Rs.20 lakhs. It is also directed that this instruction will apply retrospectively to pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in the Tribunal. Pending appeals below the specified tax limit may be withdrawn/not pressed by the Department. The CBDT Vide Circular No.17/2019 Dated 08.08.2019 amended the earlier Circular No.3/2018 (supra) whereby it has been directed that monetary limit for filing the Departmental appeal in Income Tax Cases may be enhanced further through this amendment in para-3 of the Circular mentioned above and accordingly, the monetary limit for filing the appeal before the Appellate Tribunal have been enhanced to Rs.50 lakhs. Since Circular No.17/2019 Dated 08.08.2019 have been issued to amend its earlier Circular No.3/2018 (supra), therefore, all the conditions of earlier Circular No.3/2018 shall apply accordingly.

3.

The Ld. D.R. in view of the above Board’s Circulars did not press the Departmental Appeals. The cases of the Department would not fall in the exceptions provided in the above Board Circulars. In the result, the Departmental appeals are not maintainable as the appeals are filed against the Board instructions referred to above and therefore, the appeals of the Department are liable to be dismissed.

4.

Learned Counsel for the Assessee appearing in Cross Objection No.113/2018 seeks permission to withdraw the cross objection. In the other cross objection Nos.198/2018 and 91/2018, no independent relief has been claimed by assessee.

1.

These are filed merely in support of the Order of the Ld. CIT(A). In view of these circumstances, the cross objections are dismissed as not pressed as well as not maintainable in the present form.

5.

In the result, all the appeals of the Department are dismissed and cross objections of the assessee are also dismissed.

More judgments on Section 268A

All 3,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 268A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →