DULHE RAM MEENA, JAIPUR,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to TDS credit on the rental income once it was proven that TDS was deducted on the declared income and deposited with the government, irrespective of the ownership or usage of the land for agricultural purposes.
What were the facts?
The assessee challenged the order confirming the disallowance of TDS credit for rental income. The CIT(A) had partly allowed the appeal, confirming the disallowance of TDS credit on rental income, citing lack of proof of ownership and agricultural use of the land.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is entitled to TDS credit on rental income when the CIT(A) had doubts about the ownership and agricultural use of the land. Whether adjustments made by CPC under Section 143(1) are permissible without prior opportunity to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Checkmate Services Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT1,392 citing143 Taxmann.com 178 · 2022 · SC · Read judgment
- 7 Horses Hospitality LLP v. ITO3 citing155 Taxmann.com 550 · 2023 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,’’SMC” JAIPUR
By way of this appeal, the assessee has challenged order passed by Learned. Addl/ JCIT(A)-2, Guwahati, on 12-12-2024, relating to the assessment year 2023-24, whereby the appeal filed by said assessee- appellant herein, against intimation order dated 23.02.2024 passed byCPC, Bangaluru, has been partly allowed.
As per memorandum of appeal, the assessee-appellant has raised the following grounds of appeal;
‘’1. In the facts and circumstances of the cas
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 199
- M/S. Harsha Engineers International Ltd… vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-2(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 1357/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- M/S. Harsha Engineers International Ltd… vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-2(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 1357/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Hiteshkumar Mohanlal Desai, Daman vs The Assessment Unit, ITO, Daman Ward, DamanITA 962/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Highrise Slipform Infra Private Limited… vs Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1267/PUN/2026[AY 2024-25]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026
- Hiteshkumar Mohanlal Desai, Daman vs The Assessment Unit, ITO, Daman Ward, DamanITA 962/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026