ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S OTM JEWELLERY PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Departmental appeal was not maintainable due to CBDT Circulars that set monetary limits for filing appeals. The Revenue did not press the appeal.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed the deletion of an addition of Rs. 73,50,000/- by the CIT(A). The tax effect in the appeal was less than Rs. 50 lakhs.
What were the issues?
Whether the Departmental appeal is maintainable before the Tribunal when the tax effect is below the prescribed monetary limit as per CBDT Circulars.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES “E”: DELHI
Before: SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI & SHRI O.P. KANT
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES “E”: DELHI BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA.No.2555/Del./2017 Assessment Year 2007-2008 The ACIT, Circle-19(1), M/s. OTM Jewellery Pvt. Room No.199C, Ltd., C-4/135, Safdarjung vs., C.R. Building, I.P. Estate, Development Area, New Delhi. New Delhi – 110016 PAN AAACO5115F (Appellant) (Respondent) For Revenue : Shri Atiq Ahmad, Sr. D.R. For Assessee : Shri Vijay Kumar Gupta, A.R. Date of Hearing : 18.09.2019 Date of Pronouncement : 18.09.2019 ORDER PER BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M.
This appeal by Revenue has been directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-36, New Delhi, Dated 14.02.2017, for the A.Y. 2007-2008, challenging the deletion of addition of Rs.73,50,000/-.
2 ITA.No.2555/Del./2017 M/s. OTM Jewellery Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
Admittedly, the tax effect in the present appeal is less than Rs.50 lakhs. Vide Circular No.3 of 2018 Dated 11th July, 2018 issued by CBDT under section 268A of the I.T. Act, it has been directed that the Department shall not file appeal before the Tribunal in case where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limit of Rs.20 lakhs. It is also directed that this instruction will apply retrospectively to pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in Tribunals. Pending appeals below the specified tax limit may be withdrawn/not pressed by the Department. The CBDT vide Circular No. 17/2019 Dated 08.08.2019 amended the earlier Circular No.3/2018 (supra) whereby it has been directed that monetary limit for filing the Departmental Appeal in Income Tax Case may be enhanced further through this amendment in para-3 of the Circular mentioned above and accordingly, the monetary limit for filing the appeal before the Appellate Tribunal have been enhanced to Rs.50 lakhs. Since Circular No. 17/2019 Dated 08.08.2019 have been issued to amend its earlier Circular 3 ITA.No.2555/Del./2017 M/s. OTM Jewellery Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi. No.3/2019 (supra), therefore, all the conditions of earlier Circular No.3/2018 shall apply accordingly.
The Ld. D.R. in view of the above Board’s Circulars did not press the Departmental Appeal. The case of the Department would not fall in the exceptions provided in the above Board Circular. In the result, the Departmental appeal is not maintainable as the appeal is filed against the Board instructions referred to above and therefore, the appeal of the Department is liable to be dismissed.
In the result, appeal of the Department dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open Court.
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026