DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 14, PUNE vs. SUNIL SHIVAJIRAO BHOSALE, PUNE
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal as not maintainable due to low tax effect, following CBDT Circular No. 17/2019. Consequently, the assessee's cross-objection was also dismissed as it did not survive.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT. The assessee filed a cross-objection. The tax effect in the Revenue's appeal was less than Rs. 50 lakhs.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal filed by the Revenue with a tax effect below the prescribed monetary limit is maintainable. The survival of an assessee's cross-objection when the main appeal is dismissed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & SHRI S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI
ORDER
PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM:
The appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 3, Pune [‘CIT(A)’ for short] dated 08.07.2019 for the assessment year C.O. No.14/PUN/2022 2012-13. The assessee filed the Cross Objection in above captioned appeal of the Revenue. – By Revenue : 2. It is stated before us that the tax effect in the present appeal is less than Rs.50 lakhs and therefore, the Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in exercise of its power vested under Sec.268A(1) of the IT Act comes into play wherein, the monetary limit for filing the appeal by the Revenue before the ITAT and various High Courts as well as Apex Court are revised with an object of reducing the tax litigation. Vide para 3 of the said circular (supra) it is stated that in cases where the tax effect in the appeals to be filed before the Appellate Tribunal does not exceed Rs.50 lakhs appeals should not be filed. Thus, taking a note of CBDT Circular No.17/2019, dated 08.08.2019 and considering the fact that the tax effect in the instant appeal is less than Rs.50 lakhs, the present appeal deserves to be dismissed as not pressed / not maintainable. However, we make it clear that the issues raised in the instant appeal are left open to be examined in the appropriate proceedings, if arises, in future. At the same time, we also make it clear that if the appeal falls in any of the exceptions C.O. No.14/PUN/2022 referred to in the above said CBDT Circular, the Revenue is at liberty to move an application for recalling the order if so advised. Accordingly, in the light of CBDT Circular No.17/2019 dated 08/08/2019, the appeal filed by the Revenue stands dismissed. 3. In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No.1449/PUN/2019 stands dismissed. C.O. No.14/PUN/2022 – By Assessee : 4. The cross objection filed by the assessee in appeal of the Revenue in ITA No.1449/PUN/2019 for the assessment year 2012-13, since the appeal of the Revenue is being dismissed on account of low tax effect, the cross objection filed by the assessee does not survive. Hence, the cross objection filed by the assessee stands dismissed. 5. In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue as well as the cross objection filed by the assessee are dismissed. Order pronounced in the open Court on this 28th day of April, 2022. Sd/- Sd/- (S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI) (INTURI RAMA RAO) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे / Pune; �दनांक / Dated : 28th April, 2022. Sujeet
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026