ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. GREEN PARK ESTATE (P) LTD., NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1531/DEL/2013Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 October 2019AY 2006-074 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the CBDT circular is binding on the tax authorities and applies to pending appeals. Therefore, the appeals filed by the Revenue were not maintainable due to the low tax effect.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed appeals before the ITAT. At the time of hearing, the Revenue pointed out a CBDT circular that enhanced the monetary limit for filing appeals to Rs. 50 lakhs before the Tribunal. The tax effect in these appeals was below this enhanced limit.

What were the issues?

Whether a CBDT circular enhancing the monetary limit for filing appeals is applicable to pending appeals before the ITAT. Whether appeals with a tax effect below the enhanced monetary limit are maintainable.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 268A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Before: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI & SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARY

For Appellant: Shri Mohit Jain, CA in ITA No.1874/14, Shri Ajay Bhagwani, CA,ITA 1251,1531, 2685/13, Shri Satajeet Goel, CA in ITA 3390/2016
For Respondent: Ms Paramita M. Biswas, CIT DR, Shri Sanjog Kapoor, Sr. DR, Shri Mohit Jain, CA in ITA No.1874/14, Shri Ajay Bhagwani, CA,ITA 1251,1531, 2685/13, Shri Satajeet Goel, CA in ITA 3390/2016
Hearing: 14.10.2019

O R D E R PER BENCH 1. The present appeals filed by the Revenue in respect of different assessees are directed against the orders passed by the CIT(A) in relation to the different assessment years.

2. At the outset of the hearing itself, the ld. DR brought to our attention that CBDT vide Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08th August 2019 has decided that the revenue would not prefer any appeal before the Tribunal if the tax effect is less than Rs. 50 lakhs. Therefore, he pleaded that the appeal of the revenue be decided as per the Instruction of the CBDT.

3.

We have heard the contention and perused the material on record. We find that the CBDT vide Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08th August 2019 has enhanced the monetary limit for filing the appeal by the department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hon’ble High Courts and Hon’ble Supreme Court. The relevant para of the aforesaid circular is reproduced as under :- “2. As a step towards further management of litigation, it has been decided by the Board that monetary limits for filing of appeals in income-tax cases be enhanced further through amendment in Para 3 of the Circular mentioned above and accordingly, the table for monetary limits specified in Para 3 of the Circular shall read as follows:

S.No. Appeals/SLPs in Income-tax Monetary Limit (Rs.) matters Before Appellate Tribunal 50.00,000 1.

2.

Before High Court 1.00.00.000 3. Before Supreme Court 2.00,00.000 3. Further, with a view to provide parity in filing of appeals in scenarios where separate order is passed by higher appellate authorities for each assessment year vis-a-vis where composite order for more than one assessment years is passed, para 5 of the circular is substituted by the following para: "5. The Assessing Officer shall calculate the tax effect separately for every assessment year in respect of the disputed issues in the case of every assessee. If, in the case of an assessee. the disputed issues arise in more than one assessment year, appeal can be filed in respect of such assessment year or years in which the tax effect in respect of the disputed issues exceeds the monetary' limit specified in para 3. No appeal shall be filed in respect of an assessment year or y ears in which the tax effect is less than the monetary limit specified in para 3. Further, even in the case of composite order of any High Court or Page | 2 appellate authority which involves more than one assessment year and common issues in more than one assessment year, no appeal shall be filed in respect of an assessment year or years in which the tax effect is less than the monetary limit specified in para 3. In case where a composite order/ judgement involves more than one assessee. each assessee shall be dealt with separately.”

4. The said modifications shall come into effect from the date of issue of this Circular.

5. The same may be brought to the notice of all concerned.

6. This issues under section 268A of the Income-tax Act, 1961.”

4.

We find that the tax effect involves in the appeal of the Revenue is below Rs. 50 lakhs. There is no dispute that the Board’s instructions or directions issued to the Income-tax authorities are binding on those authorities, therefore, the Department should have withdrawn/not pressed the present appeal in view of the aforesaid instruction since the tax effect in the instant appeal is less than the amount of Rs. 50 lakhs. The issue of applicability of the above circular to pending appeals has been decided by the coordinate bench in Dinesh Madhavlal Patel [TS-469-ITAT- 2019(Ahd)] 2019-TIOL-1556-ITAT-AHM dated 14th August, 2019 .

5.

In view of the above, Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08/08/2019 will apply to all pending appeals. Therefore the precedent, it is held that the appeal is not maintainable in the instant case as the tax effect is less than Rs. 50 lakhs. Accordingly, it is held that appeal filed by the revenue is not maintainable. We also hastened to add that certain times instances stated in para No. 10 of the CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 dated 11.07.2018 is not discernable from the assessment and appellate orders, therefore, in such cases, we also give liberty to revenue that if such instances comes to their notice than, revenue may file miscellaneous application with such evidences.

6.

In the result, appeals filed by the department are dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 14th October, 2019.

More judgments on Section 268A

All 3,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 268A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →