ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL CIRCLE), BAREILLY vs. VARUNARJUN TRUST, LUCKNOW
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the donations were genuine, relying on previous ITAT judgments that found similar donations to be valid. The AO's disallowance was based on unsubstantiated assumptions and retracted statements.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer made an addition of Rs. 3,75,00,000/- to the assessee trust's income, treating donations received as unaccounted income. The AO disbelieved confirmations from donor entities, stating they failed to provide substantive evidence.
What were the issues?
Whether donations received by a charitable trust can be treated as unexplained income when donor entities provide confirmations and bank statements, and previous ITAT rulings support the genuineness of such donations.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(23)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Kelvinator of India Ltd.1,673 citing320 ITR 561 · 2010 · SC · Read judgment
- Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. v. ITO862 citing236 ITR 34 · 1999 · SC
- Hindustan Lever Ltd. v. R.B. Wadkar695 citing268 ITR 332 · 2004 · HC
- Phool Chand Bajrang Lal v. ITO396 citing203 ITR 456 · 1993 · SC · Read judgment
- Haryana Acrylic Manufacturing Company v. CIT248 citing175 Taxmann 262 · 2009 · HC
- Ganga Saran and Sons P. Ltd. v. ITO234 citing130 ITR 1 · 1981 · SC
- Well Intertrade (P) Ltd., & Another v. Income Tax Officer74 citing308 ITR 22 · 2009 · HC
- Pon Adithan v. Dy. Director, Narcotics Control Bureau73 citing6 SCC 1 · 1999
- Director of Income Tax (Exemption) v. Keshav Social and Charitable Foundation42 citing278 ITR 152 · 2005 · HC
- CIT v. Elgi Finance Ltd.29 citing286 ITR 674 · 2006 · HC
- Nirmal Bang Nirmal Bang Securities (P) Ltd. v. ACIT25 citing382 ITR 93 · 2016 · HC
- Amiya Sales and Industries v. ACIT18 citing274 ITR 25 · 2005 · HC
- CIT v. M. N. Raigi16 citing17 ITR 180 · 1949 · HC
- CIT v. Apeejay Education Society14 citing59 Taxmann.com 102 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
- 77 (Gujarat) (vi) Swarovski India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT9 citing178 Taxmann 27 · 2009 · HC
- 86 (Delhi) (ix) CIT v. Suren International (P.) Ltd.9 citing35 Taxmann.com 398 · 2013 · HC
- Sita World Travels (India) Ltd. v. CIT9 citing274 ITR 186 · 2005 · HC
- 36 (Delhi) (vii) Rural Electrification Corpn. Ltd. v. CIT7 citing33 Taxmann.com 86 · 2013 · HC
- Income Tax v. MotiBaghMutual Aid Education7 citing298 ITR 190 · 2008 · HC
- UNITECH LIMITED v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX6 citing397 ITR 547 · 2017 · HC
- CIT v. KapilDev3 citing177 Taxmann 6 · 2009 · HC
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax v. Simplex Concrete Piles (India) Ltd.3 citing254 CTR 221 · 2012 · SC
- Universal Subscription Agency v. JCIT Jurisdictional Allahabad High Court3 citing293 ITR 244 · 2007 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH ‘A’, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA & SHRI SUBHASH MALGURIA
PER BENCH:
These two appeals have been filed by Revenue pertaining to assessment years 2015-16 and 2016-17 against separate impugned appellate orders of learned CIT(A), dated 26/03/2022 (for assessment year 2016-17) and dated 20/08/204 (for assessment year 2015-16).
The facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessment order dated 26/03/2022 was passed by the Assessing Officer wherein the income of the assessee was assessed at Rs.3,75,00,000/- as against returned income of I.T.A. No.619 & 620/Lkw/2024 Assessment year:2015-16 & 16-17 nil. In the aforesaid assessment order, an addition of Rs.3,75,00,000/- was made by the Assessing Officer holding that the as
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026