SHRI HARI NARAIN YADAV,KANPUR vs. ITO WARD-1(1)(5), KANPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the penalty was levied without providing a reasonable opportunity to the assessee and without establishing a reasonable cause for non-compliance. The Assessing Officer also failed to make a good case for the levy of the penalty.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order confirming a penalty of Rs. 10,000 imposed under section 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with notices issued under section 142(1) or 143(2) or 142(2A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The penalty was confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC, which dismissed the assessee's appeal in limine.
What were the issues?
Whether the penalty imposed under section 272A(1)(d) was rightly confirmed when the assessee was not given a reasonable opportunity to explain non-compliance and no reasonable cause was established.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 272A(1)(d),Section 142(1),Section 143(2),Section 142(2A),Section 250,Section 273B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH “A”, LUCKNOW
PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, A.M.:
The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the impugned order dated 29.10.2024 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC)- Delhi, under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as to “the Act”), for the assessment year 2017-18 wherein the assessee’s appeal has been dismissed in limine for the reason of non compliance. The grounds of appeal of the assessee are as under: -
“1. That the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (A), NFAC, Delhi has been wrong in law and on facts in confirming the penalty of Rs.10000/- imposed u/s 272A(1)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 vide DIN & order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1070016573 (1) dated 29.10.2024 for non-compliance of notices U/s
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 272A(1)(d)
- Vipulbhai Keharbhai Kukadiya, Bhavnagar vs The Income Tax Office, Ward 1(9) Bhavnagar…ITA 2465/AHD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Vipulbhai Keharbhai Kukadiya, Bhavnagar vs The Income Tax Office, Ward 1(9) Bhavnagar…ITA 2464/AHD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Alkeshbhai Chimanbhai Barot, Ahmedabad vs ITO Ward 1(2)(1), AhmedabadITA 178/AHD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Alkeshbhai Chimanbhai Barot, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward 1(2)(1), AhmedabadITA 177/AHD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- S.T.Promotors vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026