Section 142(2A) of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.268

Section 142(2A) falls under section 142 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which corresponds to section 268 (Inquiry before assessment) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 268 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 142(2A) is Godhra Electricity Co. Ltd. v. CIT (225 ITR 746), cited in 514 of the 676 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 142(2A)

Godhra Electricity Co. Ltd. v. CIT
225 ITR 746 · 1997 · Supreme Court
514
citing judgments

Income is not taxable until it actually accrues or is received; hypothetical income, based on a mere claim not yet settled, is not chargeable to tax.

CIT v. Winsome Textile Industries Ltd.
319 ITR 204 · 2009 · High Court
378
citing judgments

Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which disallows expenditure incurred in relation to exempt income, is not applicable if the assessee has not earned any exempt income in the relevant assessment year.

CIT v. Walchand & Co.
65 ITR 381 · 1967 · Supreme Court
314
citing judgments

The necessity and reasonableness of business expenditure, including the utilization of borrowed funds, must be judged from the perspective of a businessman based on commercial expediency, and cannot be dictated by revenue authorities. The onus is on the assessee to demonstrate the business purpose and commercial expediency.

M/s Sahara India (Farms) v. CIT & Anr.
300 ITR 403 · 2008 · Supreme Court
268
citing judgments

Administrative orders must be consistent with the rules of natural justice.

CIT v. T.V. Sundaram Iyengar & Sons Ltd.
222 ITR 344 · 1996 · Supreme Court
223
citing judgments

Unclaimed deposits received in the course of trading transactions and sundry credit balances written back are taxable as business income under Section 41(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as they constitute a cessation of trading liability.

CIT v. Ankitech (P) Ltd.
340 ITR 14 · 2012 · High Court
202
citing judgments

Deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) cannot be taxed in the hands of a non-shareholder. The Supreme Court confirmed this view, affirming the Delhi High Court's decision in Ankitech.

Sayaji Iron & Engg. Co. v. CIT
253 ITR 749 · 2002 · High Court
181
citing judgments

For a limited company, expenses cannot be disallowed merely on the grounds of presumed personal use of assets by directors or by treating the expenditure as a non-business purpose. Percentage disallowances of expenses in such cases are not sustainable.

Vijayadevi Naval Kishore Bharatia v. Land Acquisition Officer
5 SCC 83 · 2003 · Supreme Court
167
citing judgments

An approving authority must apply its mind and cannot reverse the findings of an adjudicating authority; it is not an appellate authority for remanding the matter.

DCIT v. Core Health Care Ltd.
298 ITR 194 · 2008 · Supreme Court
165
citing judgments

Interest expenditure incurred for acquiring capital assets, even if capitalized in the books, is deductible if for the purpose of business. Section 36(1)(iii) is a self-contained code regarding such deductions.

Jamshedpur Motor Accessories Stores v. CIT
72 ITR 612 · 1969 · Supreme Court
140
citing judgments

The reasonableness of an expenditure for business purposes must be assessed from the businessman's perspective, not the revenue's, and the primary motive to earn income directly is not a prerequisite for its admissibility as a deduction.

Judgments on Section 142(2A)

Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority, Mohali vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), Mohali

The appeals stand allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh01 Oct 2026AY 2021-22

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Rajesh Damodarlal Sharma, Jm 1. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.633/Chandi/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16) & 2. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.634/Chandi/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2016-17) & 3. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.635/Chandi/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18) & 4. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.636/Chandi/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2021-22) Punjab Urban Planning & Dcit Circle – 6(1) Development Authority (Puda) Mohali, Punjab बनाम/ Vs. Room No. 301, 3Rd Floor Puda Bhawan, Sector – 62 Mohali, Punjab – 160062 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaalp-0045-J (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Sh. Parikshit Aggarwal (Ca) & Sh. Hrithik Singla (Ca) – Ld. Ars ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Smt. Jaishree Sharma (Cit) Ld. Dr (Virtual) सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 22-09-2026 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement 01-10-2026 :

For Appellant: Sh. Parikshit Aggarwal (CA) &For Respondent: Smt. Jaishree Sharma (CIT) Ld. DR (Virtual)
Section 10(20)Section 12ASection 142Section 143(3)

Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority, Mohali vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 6(1), Mohali

The appeals stand allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh01 Oct 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Rajesh Damodarlal Sharma, Jm 1. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.633/Chandi/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16) & 2. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.634/Chandi/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2016-17) & 3. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.635/Chandi/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18) & 4. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.636/Chandi/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2021-22) Punjab Urban Planning & Dcit Circle – 6(1) Development Authority (Puda) Mohali, Punjab बनाम/ Vs. Room No. 301, 3Rd Floor Puda Bhawan, Sector – 62 Mohali, Punjab – 160062 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaalp-0045-J (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Sh. Parikshit Aggarwal (Ca) & Sh. Hrithik Singla (Ca) – Ld. Ars ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Smt. Jaishree Sharma (Cit) Ld. Dr (Virtual) सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 22-09-2026 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement 01-10-2026 :

For Appellant: Sh. Parikshit Aggarwal (CA) &For Respondent: Smt. Jaishree Sharma (CIT) Ld. DR (Virtual)
Section 10(20)Section 12ASection 142Section 143(3)

Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority, Mohali vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 6(1), Mohali

The appeals stand allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 634/CHANDI/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh01 Oct 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Rajesh Damodarlal Sharma, Jm 1. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.633/Chandi/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16) & 2. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.634/Chandi/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2016-17) & 3. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.635/Chandi/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18) & 4. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.636/Chandi/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2021-22) Punjab Urban Planning & Dcit Circle – 6(1) Development Authority (Puda) Mohali, Punjab बनाम/ Vs. Room No. 301, 3Rd Floor Puda Bhawan, Sector – 62 Mohali, Punjab – 160062 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaalp-0045-J (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Sh. Parikshit Aggarwal (Ca) & Sh. Hrithik Singla (Ca) – Ld. Ars ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Smt. Jaishree Sharma (Cit) Ld. Dr (Virtual) सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 22-09-2026 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement 01-10-2026 :

For Appellant: Sh. Parikshit Aggarwal (CA) &For Respondent: Smt. Jaishree Sharma (CIT) Ld. DR (Virtual)
Section 10(20)Section 12ASection 142Section 143(3)

Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority, Mohali vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 6(1), Mohali

The appeals stand allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 633/CHANDI/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh01 Oct 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Rajesh Damodarlal Sharma, Jm 1. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.633/Chandi/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16) & 2. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.634/Chandi/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2016-17) & 3. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.635/Chandi/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18) & 4. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.636/Chandi/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2021-22) Punjab Urban Planning & Dcit Circle – 6(1) Development Authority (Puda) Mohali, Punjab बनाम/ Vs. Room No. 301, 3Rd Floor Puda Bhawan, Sector – 62 Mohali, Punjab – 160062 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaalp-0045-J (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Sh. Parikshit Aggarwal (Ca) & Sh. Hrithik Singla (Ca) – Ld. Ars ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Smt. Jaishree Sharma (Cit) Ld. Dr (Virtual) सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 22-09-2026 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement 01-10-2026 :

For Appellant: Sh. Parikshit Aggarwal (CA) &For Respondent: Smt. Jaishree Sharma (CIT) Ld. DR (Virtual)
Section 10(20)Section 12ASection 142Section 143(3)