ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-19, DELHI, DELHI vs. DEEPA TALWAR, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the approval granted under Section 153D was mechanical and vitiated the entire search assessment proceedings. Following previous decisions on similar grounds, the Tribunal quashed the assessments.
What were the facts?
The appeals concerned search assessments where the assessees challenged the validity of the assessment proceedings. The primary contention was that the mandatory approval under Section 153D of the Income Tax Act was granted mechanically by the Joint Commissioner without due application of mind.
What were the issues?
Whether the approval granted under Section 153D for search assessments was valid or mechanical, and if mechanical, whether it vitiates the entire assessment proceedings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(23)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- PCIT v. Shiv Kumar Nayyar597 citing163 Taxmann.com 9 · 2024 · HC · Read judgment
- PCIT v. Sapna Gupta591 citing147 Taxmann.com 288 · 2023 · HC
- CIT v. Kelvinator of India Ltd.439 citing256 ITR 1 · 2002 · HC
- Kunhayammed v. State of Kerala361 citing245 ITR 360 · 2000 · SC
- 21. In SB Gurbaksh Singh v. Union of India318 citing2 SCC 181 · 2007 · SC
- ACIT v. Sirajuddin& Co.288 citing150 Taxmann.com 146 · 2023 · HC
- PCIT v. Anuj Bansal181 citing165 Taxmann.com 2 · 2024 · HC
- 176 citing
- Home Finders Housing Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer Ward 2(3), Chennai125 citing93 Taxmann.com 371 · 2018 · HC
- Rajesh Kumar v. DCIT121 citing157 Taxmann 168 · 2006 · SC · Read judgment
- 361 (SC) and DGIT(Inv.) v. Spacewood Furnishers (P) Ltd.114 citing374 ITR 595 · 2015 · SC
- Sahara India v. CIT108 citing169 Taxmann 328 · 2008 · SC
- Dheeraj Chaudhary v. ACIT90 citing178 Taxmann.com 360 · 2025 · HC
- Guduthur Bros. v. Income-Tax Officer75 citing40 ITR 298 · 1960 · SC · Read judgment
- Dinshaw Darabshaw Shroff v. CIT70 citing11 ITR 172 · 1943 · HC
- Gayathri Textiles v. CIT69 citing111 Taxmann 123 · 2000 · HC
- Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India62 citing4 SCC 379 · 1980
- Yum! Restaurants Asia Pte.Ltd. v. DCIT50 citing397 ITR 665 · 2017 · HC
- CIT, 1 SOT 281 (Jodh) Ratan Lal Dalmia vs Income Tax Officer; 230 ITR 301 (MP) CIT v. Vijay Dall Mills45 citing44 Taxmann.com 311 · 2014 · HC
- 243 ITR 674 (Karnn) Gayathri Textiles v. CIT44 citing230 ITR 301 · 1998 · HC
- 40 ITR 298 (SC) Guduthur Bros. v. Income Tax Officer44 citing180 ITR 84 · 1989 · HC
- 245 ITR 360(SC) and Khoday Distilleries Ltd. v. MahadeshwaraSahakaraSakkareKarkhane Ltd.31 citing104 Taxmann.com 25 · 2019 · SC
- Manoharan v. ACIT31 citing155 Taxmann 569 · 2006 · HC
Heard together (4 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “A”: NEW DELHI Central Circle-19, 6/14, Shanti Niketan, Delhi New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: AAUPT4464F
CO 97/Del/2025 (In ITA No. 2203/Del/2025) (Assessment Year: 2017-18) 6/14, Shanti Niketan, Central Circle-19, New Delhi Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: AAUPT4464F
ITA Nos. 2203 & 2221/Del/2025 (Assessment Years: 2016-17 & 2017-18) Central Circle-19, C-4/6, APJ Abdul Kalam Delhi Road, New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: AGJPK1064B C-4/6, APJ Abdul Kalam Central Circle-19, Road, New Delhi Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: AGJPK1064B Co No. 98/Del/2025 (In ITA No. 2221/Del/2025 (Assessment Year: 2017-18) C-4/6, APJ Abdul Kalam Central Circle-19, Road, New Delhi Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: AGJPK1064B
Assessee by : Shri Sanjay Kumar Agarwal, CA Shri Lakshay Gupta, CA Shri Sumaksh Mahajan, CA Revenue by: Shri Jitender Singh, CIT DR Shri Nitin Kumar Jaiman, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 23/12/2025 Date of pronounce
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153D
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Babita Panda, Bhubaneswar vs DCIT, Central Circle 1, BhubaneswarITA 603/CTK/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Sarat Chandra Panda, Bhubaneswar vs DCIT, Central Circle 1, BhubaneswarITA 602/CTK/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Babita Panda, Bhubaneswar vs DCIT, Central Circle 1, BhubaneswarITSSA 66/CTK/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Babita Panda, Bhubaneswar vs DCIT, Central Circle 1, BhubaneswarITSSA 65/CTK/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026