NANDED DIST JUDICIAL EMPLOYEES CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,NANDED vs. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX, CPC, BENGALURU
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the NFAC's order and remanded the matter back for re-adjudication. The assessee is to be granted a reasonable opportunity of hearing by the NFAC.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal concerned the disallowance of deduction under Section 80P. The assessee also contended that they were denied a fair opportunity of being heard by the NFAC via video conference.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee was denied a fair opportunity of hearing and the allowability of deduction under Section 80P.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, PUNE
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA ROAO & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY
ORDER PER BENCH This appeal preferred by the assessee emanates from the order National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, dated 01-011-2021 for the assessment year 2018-19, as per the following grounds of appeal.
“1. The ld. CIT(A), NFAC erred in law and on facts in confirming the disallowance of deduction u/s 80P of the Act of Rs. 33,33,790/- made by the ld. ADIT, CPC Bangaluru (hereinafter jointly referred to as the ld. IT authorities.
The ld. CIT(A) erred in law and on facts by denying the appellant the opportunity of being heard by way of video conference and thereby failed to grant the appellant a fair opportunity of being heard.
The I.T. authorities failed to appreciate the fact that the delay in filing of ITR was on account of reasons which were beyond the control of the appellant.
The appellant craves leave to add, alter, clarify, explain, modify, delete any of the grounds of appeal
, and to seek any just and fair relief.”
2. At the time of hearing none appeared for the assessee. The submissions of the ld. D.R are recorded and the case is decided on merits based on materials/documents available on record.
2 ITA 704/PUN/2021 Nanded Dist. Judicial Employees A.Y. 2018-19
3. The NFAC had confirmed the disallowance of deduction u/s 80P of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) of Rs. 33,33,790/- made by CPC, Bangaluru. That, as per ground No. 2 in the grounds of appeal, the assessee contends that an opportunity of being heard by way of video conference was not granted by the NFAC and thereby the assessee was not allowed a fair opportunity of being heard. In this regard, the ld. D.R submitted that the matter may be remanded back to the file of NFAC to decide the issue of allowability of deduction u/s 80P of the Act on merits.
4. Having perused the materials on record and the orders of the subordinate authorities and also considering the ground No. 2 of the assessee raised in this appeal, we are of the considered view that reasonable opportunity of hearing should be granted to the assessee by NFAC and the matter should be decided substantially on merits as per law. In view thereof, we set aside the order of the NFAC and remand the same back to its file for re-adjudicating as per law.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open Court on this 30th September 2022.
Sd/- sd/- (INTURI RAMA RAO) (PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Pune; Dated, this 30th day of September 2022 Ankam Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1. 1. The Appellant. 2. The Respondent. 3. The Pr. CIT- 1, Pune 4. The NFAC, Delhi 5. The D.R. ITAT „A‟ Bench Pune. 6. Guard File BY ORDER, /// TRUE COPY/// Sr. Private Secretary
3 ITA 704/PUN/2021 Nanded Dist. Judicial Employees A.Y. 2018-19 Date 1 Draft dictated on 27-09-2022 Sr.PS 2 Draft placed before author 27-09-2022 Sr.PS 3 Draft proposed and placed before the JM/AM second Member 4 Draft discussed/approved by second AM/JM Member 5 Approved draft comes to the Sr. PS/PS Sr.PS/PS 6 Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS/PS 7 Date of uploading of order Sr.PS/PS 8 File sent to Bench Clerk Sr.PS/PS
ITAT, Pune
4 ITA 704/PUN/2021 Nanded Dist. Judicial Employees A.Y. 2018-19
9 Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk 10 Date on which file goes to the A.R 11 Date of dispatch of order
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026