ACIT 3 (1)(1), MUMBAI vs. M/S BASMATI SECURITIES PVT LTD., MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The CIT(A) correctly deleted the disallowance under Section 14A because the assessee had not earned any exempt income during the year. This aligns with judicial precedent from the Hon'ble Apex Court.
What were the facts?
The revenue appealed against the deletion of disallowance under Section 14A. The Assessing Officer had made the disallowance, but the CIT(A) deleted it.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowance under Section 14A can be made when no exempt income is earned by the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Chettinad Logistics (P.) Ltd.421 citing95 Taxmann.com 250 · 2018 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JM & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण “एक-सदस्य मामला ” न्यायपीठ म ुंबई में। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI माननीय श्री विकास अिस्थी, न्यावयक सदस्य एवं माननीय श्री मनोज कुमार अग्रवाल ,लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JM AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM (Hearing through Video Conferencing Mode) आयकरअपील सं./ (धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2015-16) ACIT-3(1)(1) M/s Basmati Securities Pvt. Ltd R. No. 607, 6th floor बिाम/ R. No. 5, GF, Heera Mahal Bldg Aaykar Bhavan, M. K. Road, 250 Kalbadevi, Vs. Mumbai – 400 020 Mumbai-400 002 स्थायीलेखासं./ जीआइआरसं./ PAN/GIR No. AAACB-4324-K (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) : Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri Sanjay J. Sethi– Ld. DR सुनवाई की तारीख/ : 07/06/2021 Date of Hearing घोषणा की तारीख / : 07/06/2021 Date of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026