DCIT CC 3(2) CEN RG 3, MUMBAI vs. VIVEK MEHROTRA, MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the Revenue's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) correctly analyzed the manufacturing process and product classification. It also noted that the revenue did not controvert the CIT(A)'s factual findings regarding the manufacturing activity.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deduction under Section 80IC for manufacturing odoriferous compounds. The AO disallowed this, stating no manufacturing activity occurred and the product classification was ineligible. The CIT(A) allowed the claim, relying on previous years' decisions and the assessee's employee's statement.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's activity constituted 'manufacturing' for the purpose of Section 80IC deduction and if the finished product was eligible for such deduction.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(20)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Radhasoami Satsang v. CIT1,695 citing193 ITR 321 · 1992 · SC
- Maxopp Investment Ltd. v. CIT1,596 citing402 ITR 640 · 2018 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Max India Ltd.1,162 citing295 ITR 282 · 2007 · SC
- ACIT v. Vireet Investment Pvt. Ltd.789 citing82 Taxmann.com 415 · 2017 · HC
- CIT v. N.C. Budharaja & Co.164 citing204 ITR 412 · 1993 · SC
- ITO v. Arihant Tiles and Marbles Pvt. Ltd.88 citing320 ITR 79 · 2010 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Tara Agencies80 citing292 ITR 444 · 2007 · SC · Read judgment
- Indian Cine Agencies v. CIT59 citing308 ITR 98 · 2009 · SC
- Commissioner of Central Excise v. Johnson & Johnson Ltd.46 citing251 ITR 323 · 2001 · SC
- 1961, in Chrestian Mica Industries Ltd. v. State of Bihar40 citing12 STC 150 · 1961 · SC
- CIT v. Emptee Poly Tarn Pvt. Ltd.34 citing320 ITR 665 · 2010 · SC
- Tata Tea Ltd. v. ACIT22 citing338 ITR 285 · 2011 · HC
- Om Prakash Gupta v. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes19 citing16 STC 935 · 1965 · HC
- 11 In Chowgule & Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India17 citing1 SCC 653 · 1981
- Arihant Tiles and Marbles (P) Ltd. 320 ITR 79 (SC) (viii) Shree Veer Aromatic Herb Products v. Income Tax Officer17 citing147 ITD 86 · 2014 · ITAT
- Nilgiri Ceylon Tea Supplying Co. v. State of Bombay15 citing10 STC 500 · 1959 · HC
- Ltd. 320 ITR 79 (SC) (viii) Shree Veer Aromatic Herb Products v. Income Tax Officer13 citing137 ITD 377 · 2012 · ITAT
- 200-11, 11-12 and 12-13 Page 4 of 21 (ii) CIT v. Vinbros & Co.9 citing20 SOT 440 · ITAT
- (i) CIT v. Vinbros & Co.9 citing218 ITR 634 · HC
- (i) CIT v. Vinbros & Co.9 citing349 ITR 697 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCHES “F”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY & SHRI RAJESH KUMAR
आदेश प्रतितिति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपील र्थी / The Appellant 1. 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 3. आयकर आय क्त(अपील) / The CIT(A)- 4. आयकर आय क्त / CIT 5. दिभ गीय प्रदिदनदि, आयकर अपीलीय अदिकरण, म ुंबई / DR, ITAT, Mumbai 6. ग र्ड फ ईल / Guard file. सत्य दपि प्रदि //True Copy//
More judgments on Section 80IC
- Neel Metal Products Ltd., New Delhi vs DCIT, Circle-18(1), New DelhiITA 5935/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- M/S. Neel Metal Products Ltd., New Delhi vs Addl. CIT, New DelhiITA 386/DEL/2017[2011-12]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026AY 2011-12
- M/S Neel Metal Products Ltd., New Delhi vs ACIT, New DelhiITA 3919/DEL/2013[2009-10]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026AY 2009-10
- Indus India, C/O Indus Appliances Pvt Ltd vs ITO, ParwanooITA 852/CHANDI/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed6 Aug 2026AY 2016-17
- Corbett Nature Reserve, Ramnagar vs Income Tax Officer, Ram NagarITA 65/RPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed28 Jul 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026