CORBETT NATURE RESERVE,RAMNAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, RAM NAGAR
What were the facts?
The assessee, a partnership firm running a resort, was denied deduction under Section 80IC due to belated filing of Form 10CCB, despite a technical glitch preventing timely online submission. Rectification and appeal to the CIT(A) were unsuccessful.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that filing Form 10CCB within the stipulated date is directory, not mandatory, citing judicial precedents. The denial of deduction solely on this ground was considered overly technical.
What were the issues?
Whether the belated filing of Form 10CCB, due to a technical glitch, warrants denial of deduction under Section 80IC. Whether the CIT(A) violated principles of natural justice by not duly considering the assessee's submissions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DEHRADUN CIRCUIT BENCH: DEHRADUN
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH & SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI
PER BENCH: This appeal by assessee is arising out of the order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Raipur [CIT(A)] in Appeal No. NFAC/2020-21/10455737 dated 25.08.2025 for Assessment Year 2021-22. 2. In this case, it is seen that the assessee is a partnership firm running a resort at Ramnagar, Nanital. In this case, the assessee was served intimation u/s 143(1) of the Act dated 03.09.2021 through which the deduction sought of Rs.13,57,365/- u/s 80IC of the IT Act was disallowed due to belated filing of Form 10CCB. This happened in spite of fact that the assessee’s Chartered Accountant had already submitted the audited form online on 31.12.221. The assessee thereafter submit
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80IC
- Neel Metal Products Ltd., New Delhi vs DCIT, Circle-18(1), New DelhiITA 5935/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- M/S. Neel Metal Products Ltd., New Delhi vs Addl. CIT, New DelhiITA 386/DEL/2017[2011-12]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026AY 2011-12
- M/S Neel Metal Products Ltd., New Delhi vs ACIT, New DelhiITA 3919/DEL/2013[2009-10]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026AY 2009-10
- Indus India, C/O Indus Appliances Pvt Ltd vs ITO, ParwanooITA 852/CHANDI/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed6 Aug 2026AY 2016-17
- DCIT, Circle-18(1), New Delhi vs Neel Metal Products Ltd., New DelhiITA 6464/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: Disposed13 Jul 2026AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mbd Alchemie Private Limited vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Asa Corporate Catalyst INDIA Private Limited vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Reliable Accessories Private Limited vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii / Avato Ward 61,Zone 5,Delhi & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Cresent Stationers vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii Ward 3 Delhi & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Drum Roll Advertising Private Limited Vani Sood vs. Commissioner Of Dgst & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026