DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX, AHMEDABAD vs. PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI, AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the entire gross credit in miscellaneous transactions could not be taxed as income, only the undisclosed income. The Ld. CIT(A)'s approach of confirming additions to the extent of undisclosed income and deleting protective additions was found logical and rational.
What were the facts?
A search action revealed handwritten diaries with cash transaction notings, which the assessee admitted were his books of accounts for unrecorded cash transactions. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions based on these seized materials and the assessee's statement.
What were the issues?
Whether the entire undisclosed receipts can be taxed as income, and the validity of additions made based on seized diaries and the CIT(A)'s relief.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 132,Section 148,Section 143(3),Section 147,Section 69A,Section 115BBE,Section 28
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(9)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Excel Industries Ltd.935 citing38 Taxmann.com 100 · 2013 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Shoorji Vallabhdas & Co.551 citing46 ITR 144 · 1962 · SC
- UCO Bank v. CIT486 citing104 Taxmann 547 · 1999 · SC
- (i) CIT v. Excel Industry Ltd.37 citing91 Taxmann 351 · 1997 · SC
- 514 (Delhi) (iii) Twylight Infrastructure (P.) Ltd. v. ITO20 citing158 Taxmann.com 378 · 2024 · HC
- (i) FIVES India Engineering & Projects (P)Ltd. v. ITO19 citing162 Taxmann.com 514 · 2024 · HC
- 100 (SC) (ii) Godhra Electricity Co. Ltd. v. CIT18 citing185 Taxmann 243 · HC
- 663 (Bombay) (v) Ravindra Reddy Katamreddy v. DCIT15 citing165 Taxmann.com 646 · 2024 · HC
- 378 (Delhi) (iv) Cipla Pharma and Life Sciences Ltd. v. DCIT12 citing159 Taxmann.com 5 · 2024 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR & SHRI NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA
PER BENCH: These 18 appeals are filed by the assessee & the Revenue against the combined order of the Commissioner of Income Tax
ITA Nos. 1138 to 1146, 1148 to 1155 & 11
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 132
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Naresh Chandra Khattar, Agra vs ITO Ward-1(1)(2), AgraITA 475/AGR/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026