ASSOCIATE ENGINEERS,PURBA MEDINIPUR vs. A.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-27(1), HALDIA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and restored the matter to the Assessing Officer. The AO was directed to verify the assessee's contention that the payees had accounted for the payments in their income, thereby making Section 40(a)(ia) non-applicable.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against a disallowance made by the Assessing Officer under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS on certain payments. The assessee contended that the payees had included these payments in their income, making the disallowance inapplicable.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) is attracted when the payees have included the disputed amounts in their income and filed Form 26A.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH KOLKATA
Before: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal
order
: April 26, 2022 ORDER
Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:
The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 28.11.2019 of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-7, Kolkata [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(A)’] passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act(hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’).
The only grievance raised by the assessee, in this appeal, is regarding disallowance made by the Assessing Officer u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act for non-deduction of TDS on certain payments. 3. At the outset, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the respective payees have duly taken into account the aforesaid payments received by the assessee in their income-tax return. He, in this respect, has relied upon provisions of proviso to section 40(a)(ia) read with section 201 to submit that as per the provisions of the Act, if the payees has taken into account the amount of receipts from the assessee while submitting their income tax return, then no such disallowance is attracted under the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. The ld. Counsel for the assessee has further submitted that two of the payees had income less than taxable limit and they have duly furnished Form 26A in this respect, which were duly filed before the Assessing Officer to show that while computing the income, they have taken into account the receipts from Assessment Year: 2013-14 Associate Engineers the assessee. The ld. AR, therefore, has submitted that the matter may be restored to the file of the Assessing Officer to verify the aforesaid contentions made by the ld. Counsel on behalf of the assessee. The ld. DR has not objected to the same.
In view of the above discussion, the impugned order of the ld. CIT(A) is set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the Assessing Officer with a direction to verify the contentions raised by the assessee regarding the non-applicability of the provision of section 40(a)(ia) as the payees have duly taken into account the amount received from the assessee for the purpose of computation of income. The Assessing Officer after considering the above contentions raised by the assessee will pass a speaking order in accordance with law.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes. Kolkata, the 26th April, 2022.
More judgments on Section 40(a)(ia)
- Rekha Agarwal, Jaipur vs ITO WD 4(1), JaipurITA 844/JPR/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Cdg Petchem Limited, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward - 1(1), HyderabadITA 1900/HYD/2025[2018-2019]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-2019
- M/S. Shree Laminators Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 4(4), KolkataITA 1534/KOL/2026[2011-2012]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2011-2012
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- J.M.Swamy vs. Government Of INDIAKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Acc LTD. vs. Secy.Industries Deptt.Orissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Kumaran Transports (Tuticorin) Private Limited vs. The Assistant Commissioner Madras · 16 Oct 2026