THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(1)., AHMEDABAD vs. N.K. INDUSTRIES LTD., AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal held that the addition on account of purchases without consideration was not justified as the assessee provided evidence of actual purchases and payments. Regarding Section 14A, no disallowance was warranted in the absence of exempt income.
What were the facts?
The appeals concerned the treatment of losses from transactions on the NSEL platform and disallowance under Section 14A. The assessee argued that NSEL transactions were for availing finance and losses represented the cost of garnering funds.
What were the issues?
Whether losses from NSEL transactions were speculative and deductible, and whether disallowance under Section 14A was applicable without exempt income.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(9)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- McDowell & Co. Ltd. v. CTO741 citing154 ITR 148 · 1985 · SC
- Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. v. CIT621 citing400 ITR 409 · 1997
- CIT v. T.V. Sundaram Iyengar & Sons Ltd.223 citing222 ITR 344 · 1996 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd.164 citing404 ITR 1 · 2018 · SC
- Solid Containers Ltd. v. DCIT74 citing308 ITR 417 · 2009 · HC
- CIT v. Ramaniyam Homes Pvt. Ltd.48 citing68 Taxmann.com 289 · 2016 · HC
- AVM Ltd. v. CIT22 citing146 ITR 355 · 1984 · HC
- CIT v. Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd.6 citing4 Taxmann 204 · HC
- 370 ITR 5474 citing370 ITR 547 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: DR. B.R.R. KUMARMS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE
PER: DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE PRESIDENT:
These cross appeals have been filed by the Revenue and the Assessee against the orders of the Ld. Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi (hereinafter referred to as "CIT(A)" for short) of even dated 30
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026