SATYEN SARAWAT L/H OF LATE SMT.ANJANA SARASWAT,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-33, KOLKATA
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings were initiated without a valid foundation, as the AO did not make any addition based on the reasons recorded for reopening. Therefore, the assumption of jurisdiction by the AO was challenged.
What were the facts?
The assessee disclosed income including long-term capital gains from the sale of immovable property. The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the assessment under Section 147, citing information about a gift and the property's value. However, no addition was made by the AO regarding the sale consideration.
What were the issues?
Whether the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 are valid when the AO does not make any addition based on the recorded reasons for reopening the assessment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 383 · 1998 · SC
- Jute Corporation of India Ltd. v. CIT1,372 citing187 ITR 688 · 1991 · SC
- CIT v. Sun Engineering Works (P) Ltd.814 citing198 ITR 297 · 1992 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Jet Airways India Ltd.13 citing321 ITR 236 · 2011 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BENCH “C”KOLKATA
Before: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Manish Borad
आदेश खुले �यायपीठ म� �दनांक 31-10-2022 को उ�घो�षत। Order pronounced in the open court on 31-10-2022 Sd/- Sd/- ( SANJAY GARG) (MANISH BORAD) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated :31-10-2022 **PP/SPS 6. Smt. Anjana Sarasat Through L/H: Sri Satyen Saraswat
आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1.अपीलाथ�/Appellant/: Sri Satyen Saraswat, L/H of Late Smt. Anjana Saraswat C/o Sri Jitendra Kaushik, Advocate, 19D Muktaram Babu Street, Kolkata-700 007. 2. ��यथ�/Respondent/:DCIT, Cir-33, Kolkata, 10B, Middleton Row, Kolkata-700 071. 3. संबं�धत आयकर आयु�त / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु�त- अपील / CIT (A) 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण कोलकाता / DR, ITAT, Kolkata 6.गाड�फाइल/Guardfile. By order/आदेश से, /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar ITAT, Kolkata
Smt. Anjana Sarasat Through L/H: Sri Satyen Saraswat
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026