THE VENUS PARKLAND CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SERVICE SOCIETY LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(3)(5), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, following its own precedent for AY 2018-19 in the assessee's case, held that interest income from Fixed Deposits was eligible for set-off against maintenance expenses under the principle of mutuality. The surplus amount, after set-off, was already offered for tax. Therefore, the addition made by the Assessing Officer was deleted.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a co-operative housing society, filed its return for AY 2020-21. The Assessing Officer made an addition of Rs. 25,36,210/- for interest income on Fixed Deposits, rejecting the applicability of the mutuality principle and the set-off of maintenance expenses. The Ld. CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal but upheld the addition. The assessee filed an appeal to the ITAT with a delay of 541 days, which was condoned.
What were the issues?
Whether the mutuality principle applies to interest income earned from fixed deposits by a co-operative housing society and whether such income can be set-off against maintenance expenses.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 144A,Section 144B,Section 2(24),Section 2(24)(vii)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Venus Parkland Co-Op. Housing Service Society Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer4 citing166 Taxmann.com 673 · 2024 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “SMC” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL & SHRI NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA
PER NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) [hereinafter referred as ‘CIT(A)’] dated 13.10.2023 for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2020-21 in the proceedings under Section 143(3) r.w.s. 144A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).
There was a delay of 541 days in filing of this appeal. The assessee has filed an affidavit signed by Sh. Pathik Mehta, Se
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144A
- Kanke General Hospital and Research Centre… vs DCIT, C.C.1, RanchiITA 259/RAN/2025[17-18]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026
- Kanke General Hospital and Research Centre… vs DCIT, C.C.1, RanchiITA 259/RAN/2025[17-18]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026
- Ramilaben Narendrabhai Parmar, Anklesshwar vs ITO, Ward-2(2), BharuchITA 24/SRT/2026[2011-12]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2011-12
- Hydrocarbons Education & Research Society… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 3519/DEL/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Creative Arts Education Society, New Delhi vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 3434/DEL/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026