NIKHIL BABAN NIMBALKAR,PUNE vs. ITO, WARD 14(5), PUNE

ORDER

PER DR. MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the appellant prays before the Hon'ble Bench to kindly grant an opportunity to represent the matter before the ld CIT(A).

3. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Assessment Order is invalid and bad in law

5. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law and without prejudice to the above grounds of appeal the Assessing Officer erred in disallowing the cost of improvement of Rs 2,90,280/- in computing the capital gain on same of impugned property

6. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law and without prejudice to the above grounds of appeal the Assessing Officer erred in disallowing the cost of improvement by invoking the provision of section 404(3) without taking cognizance of the fact that the said section has no applicability to computation of income under head capital gains

7. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law and without prejudice to the above grounds of appeal the Assessing Officer erred making addition of Rs 54,72,500/- as income from other sources

9. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law and without prejudice to the above grounds of appeal the Assessing Officer erred in making addition of Rs 54,72,500/- in the hands of the appellant on the basis of surmises and conjectures

the Assessing Officer erred in not taking cognizance of the affidavit filed by the appellant to the effect that the impugned property was sold for consideration recorded in the sale agreement and the affidavit of the purchaser namely Mr Sumit Tilekar asserting to the fact that he did not pay any consideration in cash to the appellant

11. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law and without prejudice to the above grounds of appeal the appellant submits that the impugned property is a rural agricultural land is not exigible to taxation

Assessee has raised following grounds of appeal in 1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Id. CIT(A) erred in not granting sufficient opportunities of hearing and dismissing the appeal exparte

2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the appellant prays before the Hon'ble Bench to kindly grant an opportunity to represent the matter before the ld CIT(A).

the Assessing Officer erred making addition of Rs. 11,25,000/- as income from other sources

7. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law and without prejudice to the above grounds of appeal the Assessing Officer erred in making addition of Rs. 11,25,000/- in respect of alleged receipt of cash sale consideration on sale of impugned property by ignoring the fact that the evidences relied upon by the Assessing Officer refer to the receipt of cash payment by other co-owners of the impugned property and not the appellant and therefore no addition could be made in the hands of the appellant

8. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law and without prejudice to the above grounds of appeal the Assessing Officer erred in making addition of Rs. 11,25,000/- in the hands of the appellant on the basis of surmises and conjectures

the Assessing Officer erred in not taking cognizance of the affidavit filed by the appellant to the effect that the impugned property was sold for consideration recorded in the sale agreement and the affidavit of the purchaser namely Mr Sumit Tilekar asserting to the fact that he did not pay any consideration in cash to the appellant

10. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law and without prejudice to the above grounds of appeal the appellant submits that the impugned property is a rural agricultural land is not exigible to taxation

11. The above grounds of appeal may kindly be allowed to be altered, amended, modified, deleted etc in the interest of natural justice.

3. At the outset Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that due to unavoidable circumstances assessee failed to appear before Ld. CIT(A) nor could submit any documentary evidence in support of its grounds of appeal. Prayer made for providing one more opportunity to go before Ld. CIT(A) for the adjudication of issues raised in the instant appeal for A.Y. 2018-19 and A.Y. 2019-20.

4. On the other hand Ld. Senior Departmental Representative (DR) vehemently argued supporting the order of Ld. CIT(A).

5. We have heard rival contentions and perused the records placed before us. We observe that the assessee is an individual and based on the information about alleged escapement of Income, re-assessment proceedings u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Act were carried out for A.Y. 2018-19 and 2019-20 and against the returned income of Rs. 19,33,520/- and Rs. 4,10,110/-, income assessed at Rs. 76,96,300/- and Rs. 15,35,110/- for assessment year 2018-19 and A.Y. 2019- 20 respectively wherein certain additions were made. The assessee challenged the additions made for both the assessment years before Ld. CIT(A) but due to non compliance assessee’s appeals were dismissed. We however notice that Ld. CIT(A) has not dealt with the merits of the case and has dismissed the appeal for non prosecution.

6. Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of Pr.CIT(Central) Vs. Premkumar Arjundas Luthra (HUF) Bombay (2017) 297 CTR 614 (Bombay) has held that Ld. CIT(A) NFAC is obliged to dispose of the appeal on merit even in an ex-parte order. In light of the above judgement and considering the facts and circumstances of the case we deem it appropriate to restore all the issues raised in instant two appeals by the assessee before this Tribunal, to the file of Ld. CIT(A) for necessary adjudication and to pass a speaking order as contemplated u/s 250(6) of the Act for which reasonable opportunity shall be provided to the assessee to furnish the submissions/documents in support of its grounds of appeal. Needless to mention that proper opportunity of hearing shall be given to the assessee. Assessee is also directed to remain vigilant and not to take adjournment unless otherwise required for reasonable cause. Effective grounds of appeal raised by the assessee in and are allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced on this 6th day of October, 2025.

Sd/- Sd/- (VINAY BHAMORE) (MANISH BORAD) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER प णी/ Pune; ददिेंंक /Dated: 06th October, 2025. Neeta आदीश की प्रधिधलधप अग्रीधर्ि /Copy of the Order forwarded to: 1.अपीलेंर्थी / The Appellant. 2.प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 3.The Pr. CIT concerned. 4.धवभेंगीय प्रधिधिधि, आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, "A" बाच, प णी / DR, ITAT, "A" Bench, Pune. 5.गेंर्ा फेंइल / Guard File. आदीशेंि सेंर / BY ORDER,

Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, प णी /ITAT, Pune.