Section 149(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act

The decision most relied on for Section 149(1)(b) is 535 (Del); 6. Tata Teleservices v. UOI (385 ITR 497), cited in 163 of the 254 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 149(1)(b)

535 (Del); 6. Tata Teleservices v. UOI
385 ITR 497 · 2016 · High Court
163
citing judgments

Reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer must strictly adhere to the due process of law and obtain the requisite prior approval, especially when reopening assessments beyond the standard four-year period or involving undisclosed foreign income and assets.

Institute of Chartered Accountants of India v. Price Waterhouse
3 SCC 722 · 2002 · Reported
58
citing judgments
B.K Gooyee v. CIT
62 ITR 109 · 1966 · High Court
26
citing judgments

A notice issued under section 34 of the Income-tax Act, 1922, that is not signed by the Income Tax Officer is invalid and considered no notice at all, as the signature is an essential and integral part of the notice.

P. Satyanarayana Chetty v. Income Tax Officer
101 ITR 385 · 1975 · High Court
25
citing judgments

Sanction for reassessment proceedings under Section 151 of the Income Tax Act must be granted with due application of mind and cannot be a mechanical or routine exercise.

Dattatraya Gopal Bhotte v. CIT
150 ITR 460 · 1984 · High Court
23
citing judgments
CIT v. Micro Labs Ltd.
348 ITR 75 · 2012 · High Court
21
citing judgments
Mayawati v. CIT
321 ITR 349 · 2010 · High Court
20
citing judgments
Cit v. Independent Mdia (P) Ltd.
210 Taxmann 14 · 2012 · High Court
19
citing judgments
Vikram Bhatnagar v. ACIT
147 Taxmann.com 254 · 2023 · High Court
16
citing judgments
Renu T Tharani v. DCIT (International Taxation)
117 Taxmann.com 84 · 2020 · Reported
15
citing judgments

Judgments on Section 149(1)(b)

Showing 120 of 254 · Page 1 of 13

...