DCIT, CIRCLE-35, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. INDIAN COAL AGENCY, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal due to low tax effect. For the assessee's appeal, it was held that the net profit calculation and depreciation on motor cars were correctly handled. However, the disallowance under Section 14A was partly erroneous, and the excess commission payment was also found to be an error.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against orders related to assessment years 2013-14 and 2015-16. The Revenue also filed an appeal for AY 2015-16. The primary issues involved the correctness of the net profit calculation, disallowance under Section 14A, depreciation on motor cars, and commission payments.
What were the issues?
The key issues were whether the Pr. CIT was justified in directing the AO to revise the net profit, disallow expenses under Section 14A, and disallow depreciation on motor cars. The Revenue's appeal questioned the CIT(A)'s treatment of laboratory sampling charges, interest-free loans, and Section 14A disallowance.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(10)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- REI Agro Ltd. v. DCIT346 citing144 ITD 141 · 2013 · ITAT
- CIT v. Walchand & Co.314 citing65 ITR 381 · 1967 · SC
- Lachminarayan Madan Lal v. CIT96 citing86 ITR 439 · 1972 · SC
- CIT v. A. Krishnaswami Mudaliar69 citing53 ITR 122 · 1964 · SC · Read judgment
- Swadeshi Cotton Mills Co. Ltd. v. CIT67 citing63 ITR 57 · 1967 · SC
- CIT v. Motor Credit Co. P. Ltd.42 citing127 ITR 572 · 1981 · HC
- Aruna Mills Ltd. v. CIT33 citing31 ITR 153 · 1957 · HC
- 2 Further, in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Motor Credit Co. (P.) Ltd.5 citing6 Taxmann 63 · 1981 · HC
- Sanjeevi & Co. v. CIT5 citing62 ITR 156 · 1966 · HC
- Lakshmi Ratan Cotton Mills Company Ltd. v. CIT3 citing37 ITR 634 · 1969
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘C’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SONJOY SARMA & SRI RAKESH MISHRA
PER RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The captioned appeal for A.Y. 2013-14 and cross appeals for A.Y. 2015-16 filed by the assessee and Revenue are against separate o
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026