Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: SHRI C.M.GARG & SHRI O.P.MEENA
आदेश /O R D E R PER O. P. MEENA, ACCOUTANT MEMBER: 1. This appeal filed by the Assessing Officer is directed against the order of learned Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals)- Valsad, dated 26.09.2016 pertaining to Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. We have heard the parties. We find that the CBDT vide Circular No.21/2015 issued on 10.12.2015 [F. No. 279/Misc. 142/2007-ITJ (Pt)] has revised the monetary limit for filing of appeal before ITAT fixing the tax effect limit at Rs.10 lacs. The
ITO-Wd-1,Navsari v. Amratbhai Dalabhai Rayaka/I.T.A. No. 3027/Ahd/2016/SRT/ay12-13 Page 2 of 7
said Circular is reproduced hereunder for ready reference :- Circular No. 21/2015
F No 279/Misc. 142/2007-ITJ (Pt) Central Board Direct Taxes New Delhi the 10th December, 2015 Subject: Revision of monetary limits for filing of appeals by the Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and High Courts and SLP before Supreme Court-measures for reducing litigation-Reg. Reference is invited to Board’s instruction No 5/2014 dated 10.07.2014 wherein monetary limits and other conditions for filing departmental appeals (in Income-tax matters) before Appellate Tribunal and High Courts and SLP before the Supreme Court were specified.
In supersession of the above instruction, it has been decided by the Board that departmental appeals may be filed on merits before Appellate Tribunal and High Courts and SLP before the Supreme Court keeping in view the monetary limits and conditions specified below.
Henceforth, appeals/ SLPs shall not be filed in cases where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limits given hereunder:
Appeals in Income-tax Monetary Limit (in S.No. matters Rs) Before Appellate 1 10,00,000/- Tribunal 2 Before High Court 20,00,000/- 3 Before Supreme Court 25,00,000/-
ITO-Wd-1,Navsari v. Amratbhai Dalabhai Rayaka/I.T.A. No. 3027/Ahd/2016/SRT/ay12-13 Page 3 of 7
It is clarified that an appeal should not be filed merely because the tax effect in a case exceeds the monetary limits prescribed above. Filing of appeal in such cases is to be decided on merits of the case. 4. For this purpose, “tax effect” means the difference between the tax on the total income assessed and the tax that would have been chargeable had such total income been reduced by the amount of income in respect of the issues against which appeal is intended to be filed (hereinafter referred to as “disputed issues”). However, the tax will not include any interest thereon, except where chargeability of interest itself is in dispute. In case the chargeability of interest is the issue under dispute, the amount of interest shall be the tax effect. In cases where returned loss is reduced or assessed as income, the tax effect would include notional tax on disputed additions. In case of penalty orders, the tax effect will mean quantum of penalty deleted or reduced in the order to be appealed against. 5. The Assessing Officer shall calculate the tax effect separately for every assessment year in respect of the disputed issues in the case of every assessee. If, in the case of an assessee, the disputed issues arise in more than one assessment year, appeal, can be filed in respect of such assessment year or years in which the tax effect in respect of the disputed issues exceeds the monetary limit specified in para 3. No appeal shall be filed in respect of an assessment year or years in which the tax effect is less than
ITO-Wd-1,Navsari v. Amratbhai Dalabhai Rayaka/I.T.A. No. 3027/Ahd/2016/SRT/ay12-13 Page 4 of 7
the monetary limit specified in para 3. In other words, henceforth, appeals can be filed only with reference to the tax effect in the relevant assessment year. However, in case of a composite order of any High Court or appellate authority, which involves more than one assessment year and common issues in more than one assessment year, appeal shall be filed in respect of all such assessment years even if the ‘tax effect’ is less than the prescribed monetary limits in any of the year(s), if it is decided to file appeal in respect of the year(s) in which ‘tax effect’ exceeds the monetary limit prescribed. In case where a composite order/ judgement involves more than one assessee, each assessee shall be dealt with separately, 6. In a case where appeal before a Tribunal or a Court is not filed only on account of the tax effect being less than the monetary limit specified above, the Commissioner of Income-tax shall specifically record that “even though the decision is not acceptable, appeal is not being filed only on the consideration that the tax effect is less than the monetary limit specified in this instruction”. Further, in such cases, there will be no presumption that the Income- tax Department has acquiesced in the decision on the disputed issues. The Income-tax Department shall not be precluded from filing an appeal against the disputed issues in the case of the same assessee for any other assessment year, or in the case of any other assessee for the same or any other assessment year, if the tax effect exceeds the specified monetary limits.
ITO-Wd-1,Navsari v. Amratbhai Dalabhai Rayaka/I.T.A. No. 3027/Ahd/2016/SRT/ay12-13 Page 5 of 7
In the past, a number of instances have come to the notice of the Board, whereby an assessee has claimed relief from the Tribunal or the Court only on the ground that the Department has implicitly accepted the decision of the Tribunal or Court in the case of the assessee for any other assessment year or in the case of any other assessee for the same or any other assessment year, by not filing an appeal on the same disputed issues. The Departmental representatives/counsels must make every effort to bring to the notice of the Tribunal or the Court that the appeal in such cases was not filed or not admitted only for the reason of the tax effect being less than the specified monetary limit and, therefore, no inference should be drawn that the decisions rendered therein were acceptable to the Department. Accordingly, they should impress upon the Tribunal or the Court that such cases do not have any precedent value. As the evidence of not filing appeal due to this instruction may have to be produced in courts, the judicial folders in the office of CsIT must be maintained in a systemic manner for easy retrieval. 5. Adverse judgments relating to the following issues should be contested on merits notwithstanding that the tax effect entailed is less than the monetary limits specified in para 3 above or there is no tax effect: (a) Where the Constitutional validity of the provisions of an Act or Rule are under challenge, or (b) Where Board’s order, Notification, Instruction or Circular has been held to be illegal or ultra vires, or
ITO-Wd-1,Navsari v. Amratbhai Dalabhai Rayaka/I.T.A. No. 3027/Ahd/2016/SRT/ay12-13 Page 6 of 7
(c) Where Revenue Audit objection in the case has been accepted by the Department, or (d) Where the addition relates to undisclosed foreign assets/ bank accounts. 6. The monetary limits specified in para 3 above shall not apply to writ matters and direct tax matters other than Income tax. Filing of appeals in other Direct tax matters shall continue to be governed by relevant provisions of statute & rules. Further, filing of appeal in cases of Income Tax, where the tax effect is not quantifiable or not involved, such as the case of registration of trusts or institutions under section 12A of the IT Act, 1961, shall not be governed by the limits specified in para 3 above and decision to file appeal in such cases may be taken on merits of a particular case. 7. This instruction will apply retrospectively to pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in High Courts/ Tribunals. Pending appeals below the specified tax limits in para 3 above may be withdrawn/not pressed. Appeals before the Supreme Court will be governed by the instructions on this subject, operative at the time when such appeal was filed. 8. This issues under section 268A (1) of the Income-tax Act 1961.”
In view of the para 10 of the above Circular, it also applies retrospectively to the appeal filed by the Revenue and such
ITO-Wd-1,Navsari v. Amratbhai Dalabhai Rayaka/I.T.A. No. 3027/Ahd/2016/SRT/ay12-13 Page 7 of 7
appeal in which the tax effect involved is below the prescribed monetary limit for filing of appeals before the ITAT are either to be withdrawn or not pressed by the Department. Therefore, the present appeal is deserves to be dismissed in limine being not maintainable.
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed, being not maintainable. 5. This order pronounced in the open court on 20.06.2018. Sd/- Sd/- (सी.एम.गग�)/(C.M. GARG) (ओ.पी.मीना)/(O.P.MEENA) �याियक सद�य/JUDICIAL MEMBER लेखा सद�य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER सुरत/ Surat: �दनांक /Dated : 20 June, 2018.OPM Copy of order forwarded to- Assessee/AO/Pr. CIT/ CIT (A)/ITAT (DR) / Guard file of Tribunal. By order / / TRUE COPY / / Assistant Registrar, Surat