SARASWATI DEVI EDUCATIONAL AND SOCIAL TRUST,MURSHIDABAD vs. ITO, WARD 1(3), EXEMPT, , KOLKATA
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that belated filing of Forms 10B/10BB is a technical breach and cannot be the sole reason to deny exemption under Sections 11, 12, or 10(23C), especially when the audit reports were available. Following the Gujarat High Court, the intimations issued under Section 143(1) denying the benefit of exemption were quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a trust, claimed exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, which was rejected by the AO CPC under Section 143(1) on the ground that Forms 10B/10BB were filed belatedly. The ld. CIT(A) upheld this rejection for assessment years 2020-2021 and 2023-2024.
What were the issues?
Whether the benefit of exemption under Sections 11, 12, or 10(23C) of the Income Tax Act can be denied solely on the ground of belated filing of audit reports (Forms 10B/10BB) when processing under Section 143(1).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 11,Section 12,Section 10(23C),Section 143(1),Section 143(1)(a),Section 139(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Sarvodaya Charitable Trust v. ITO (Exemption)129 citing125 Taxmann.com 75 · 2021 · HC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY
O R D E R Per Rajesh Kumar, AM : These two appeals are filed by the assessee against the order passed by the ld. Addl./JCIT(A)-2, Ludhiana, both dated 06.03.2025, for the assessment years 2020-2021 & 2023-2024.
In both the appeals, the ld. AR submitted that the assessee is a trust and filed its return of income 7claiming exemption u/s.11 of the Act but the AO CPC rejected the said claim while processing and by passing order u/s 143(1) of the Act on the ground that the IT Return and Form 10B were filed belatedly.
Further the ld.AR submitted that the ld.AO before making adjustment in the intimation u/s.143(1) of the Act for both the years under consideration has not provided opportunity by sending intimation in terms of proviso to Section 143(1)(a) of the Act. Therefore, ld.AR submitted that the intimations issued by the for both the years under appeal deserved to be quashed.
3. On the other hand, ld.CIT-DR vehemently supported the orders of the lower authorities and submitted that the assessee was required to file Form 10B/10BB along with the return of income within the time prescribed under the Act, which has not been done by the assessee. Therefore, ld. CIT-DR submitted that the ld. CIT(A) has rightly rejected the claim of the assessee on account of late filing of Form 10B/10BB and prayed for upholding the same.
After hearing the rival contentions and perusing the material available on record, we find that the assessee has filed its return of income on 27.03.2021 for A.Y.2020-2021 and on 31.10.2023 for A.Y.2023-2024. The Form 10B and Form 10BB had been filed along with returns of income for the said assessment years under consideration on 27.03.2021 & 31.10.2023, respectively. The due date for furnishing Form 10B/10BB for the assessment year 2020-2021 & 2023-2024 was prior to one month before the due date for furnishing return u/s.139(1) of the Act. The intimations/orders u/s.143(1) of the Act had been issued for A.Y. on 24.12.2021 and for AY 2023-2024 on 04.12.2024. The CPC had denied the assessee the benefit of exemption u/s.11 & 10(23C) of the Act on the ground that the audit report in Form 10B/10BB had been filed belatedly. The ld CIT(A) dismissed the appeals of the assessee by observing that the in order claim exemption u/s 11 & 12 of the Act certain conditions are required to be satisfied which were not fulfilled by the assessee. It is noticed that the audit report was very much available with the Assessing Officer when the returns of income were processed and this is only a technical/procedural breach. The coordinate bench of the Tribunal has been holding that such technical lapse cannot lead to denial of exemption u/s.11 & 12 of the Act that too in the intimation u/s.143(1) of the Act. This view is also supported by the decision of the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Sarvodaya Charitable Trust, reported in [2021] 125 taxmann.com 75 (Gujarat), wherein the Hon’ble High Court has held that exemption u/s.11 of the Act cannot be denied for delayed filing of Form 10B. It has also been held by the Hon’ble High Court that as the assessee is a charitable trust who satisfies the conditions for availing the benefit of exemption, the assessee could not be denied exemption merely on the ground that Form 10B was filed belatedly especially when legislature had conferred wide discretionary powers to condone such delay on authorities concerned. Consequently, respectfully following the decision of the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court, the intimations issued u./s.143(1) of the Act by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the ld. CIT(A) denying the benefit of Section 11 & 12 of the Act for A.Y.2020-2021 on account of delay in filing Form 10B and denying the benefit of Sections 11 or 10(23C) of the Act on account of belated filing of Form 10BB for A.Y. 2023-2024, are hereby quashed.
Similar judgments
Other orders that rely on the same authority or decide the same section.
- Rotary Club of Bombay Queens Necklace… vs ITO Ward 2(2), MumbaiMumbai6 Mar 2026Allowed
Also relies on Sarvodaya Charitable Trust v. ITO (Exemption)
The Tribunal held that the delay of 29 days in filing Form 10B was condonable as it was a procedural lapse, and the report was filed before the return of income. The exemption should not be denied for such a minor delay.
- Kinkini, Bhilwara vs ITO Exemption Ward 1, JaipurJaipur24 Dec 2025Allowed
Also relies on Sarvodaya Charitable Trust v. ITO (Exemption)
The Tribunal held that the delay in filing Form 10BB is a procedural requirement and not a mandatory condition for claiming exemption under Section 11. As long as the form is filed and available during assessment proceed...
- Mig Cricket Club, Mumbai vs DCIT(E)-2, MumbaiMumbai28 Nov 2025Allowed
Also relies on Sarvodaya Charitable Trust v. ITO (Exemption)
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the audit report, holding that its submission during appellate proceedings should be considered. The Assessing Officer was directed to examine the audit report and decide the exe...
- Institute of Defence Studies and Research… vs The ITO Exemption, Ward (1), Ahmedabad.Ahmedabad13 Aug 2025Allowed
Also relies on Sarvodaya Charitable Trust v. ITO (Exemption)
The Tribunal held that a delay in filing Form 10B is a procedural default and should not disentitle the assessee from claiming exemption under Section 11, especially when the form was available with the Assessing Officer...
- ITO(Exemption), Ward-2(4), Shillong vs North East Society of Sisters of the Holy…Guwahati11 Aug 2025Allowed
Also relies on Sarvodaya Charitable Trust v. ITO (Exemption)
The Tribunal held that the delay in filing Form 10B is condonable and not fatal to the claim for exemption under Section 11. Following various judicial pronouncements, the Tribunal directed that the assessee be allowed t...
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026