G 1707 ECHOOR PACCS LTD.,KANCHIPURAM vs. ITO, WARD-1,, KANCHIPURAM
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that both the AO and CIT(A) passed orders without giving proper opportunity to the assessee. Therefore, to meet the ends of justice, the matter was remitted back to the AO for denovo adjudication with liberty to the assessee to submit relevant details.
What were the facts?
The assessee, an Agricultural credit Cooperative Society, did not file its return of income for A.Y. 2018-19. Based on information of withdrawal from its bank account, the AO initiated reassessment proceedings. The assessee filed a return claiming deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) but did not respond to further notices, leading to an addition u/s. 69A.
What were the issues?
Whether the lower authorities have granted proper opportunity to the assessee for reassessment proceedings and adjudication of claims.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 148,Section 80P(2)(a)(i),Section 147,Section 69A,Section 139(1),Section 80P
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K & SHRI S.R. RAGHUNATHA
आदेश / O R D E R
PER S.R. RAGHUNATHA, A.M :
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, [hereinafter “CIT(A)”] for the assessment year 2018-19, vide order dated 14.10.2024.
ITA No.3200/Chny/2023 :- 2 -:
The assessee is an Agricultural credit Cooperative Society that did not file return of income for the A.Y 2018-19. Based on the information, the assessee had withdrawn Rs. 1,09,30,000/- from its Bank account, the A.O issued notice u/s. 148 of the Act to the assessee and the assessee chose to remain silent. The A.O then proceeded with re-assessment proceedings and issued statutory notices to the assessee. In response to notice u/s. 148 of the Act, the assessee filed its return of income, claiming a deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act of Rs. 2,43,136/-. As the assessee had not filed any further reply to the notices, the A.O issued show cause notices dated 14.03.2023 & 24.03.2023 to the assessee. Since, the assessee did not respond for the show cause notices, the A.O had passed an order u/s. 147 of the Act dated 29.03.2023 by making an addition of Rs. 1,14,30,000/- u/s. 69A of the Act on account of unexplained cash deposits and also disallowed deduction claimed u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act as the assessee had not filed the return of income within due date u/s. 139(1) of the Act. Aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A).
On appeal, the Ld. CIT(A) also dismissed the appeal of the assessee on the ground that the assessee did not file its return of :- 3 -: income for the A.Y 2018-19 within due date allowed u/s. 139(1) of the Act and hence, not eligible for deduction u/s. 80P of the Act.
The Ld. Counsel for the assessee prayed for setting aside the order of the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication, since the case was not prosecuted before the Assessing Officer and the same has been confirmed by the Ld. CIT(A) without any discussion.
Per contra, the Ld. DR relied on the orders of the lower authorities and prayed for confirming the impugned order.
We have heard both the parties and gone through the order of the lower authorities below. It is noted that the AO and that of the Ld. CIT(A) have passed the orders without giving proper opportunity to the assessee. Therefore, to meet the ends of justice by providing one more opportunity to the assessee, we remit the matter back to the file of the AO for denovo adjudication. We also direct the assessee to appear before the AO and at liberty to submit the relevant details before the AO for adjudication of the case.
ITA No.3200/Chny/2023 :- 4 -:
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on 21st February, 2025.
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026