THE DCIT, (OSD)-I, CIRCLE-4, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. KARGIL HOLDINGS PVT. LTD., AHMEDABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1459/AHD/2015Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 January 2018AY 2011-123 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal due to low tax effect, citing a CBDT circular. The Tribunal also dismissed the assessee's cross-objection, upholding the disallowance of administrative expenditure.

What were the facts?

The Revenue appealed against a partial disallowance of Rs. 1,24,000 under Section 14A read with Rule 8D. The assessee filed a cross-objection challenging this disallowance.

What were the issues?

Whether the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D for administrative expenses is justified, and whether the Revenue's appeal should be pressed given the low tax effect.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 14A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “A” BENCH AHMEDABAD

Hearing: 29.01.2018Pronounced: 30.01.2018

PER S. S. GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER

This Revenue’s appeal and assessee’s cross objection for assessment year 2011-12 arise against the CIT(A)-2, Ahmedabad’s order dated 02.03.2015 in case no. CIT(A)-2/DCIT (O )-1, Cir.4/189/2013-14, partly upholding Assessing Officer’s action making Section 14A r.w. Rule 8D disallowance of ITA No. 1459/Ahd/15 with 177/Ahd/15 [M/s. Kargil Holding Pvt. Ltd.] - 2 – A.Y. 2011-12

Rs.20,91,588/- to the extent of Rs.1,24,000/- only pertaining to administrative expenditure @.5%, in proceedings u/s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act”. Heard both the parties. Case file perused.

2.

We notice at the outset that the Revenue’s sole substantive ground seeks to revive disallowance of interest expenditure amounting to Rs.19,67,223/- made by the Assessing Officer as deleted in lower appellate proceedings. Learned Departmental Representative fails to dispute that the net tax effect in the instant appeal is less than Rs.10 lacs. We find that the Central Board of Direct Taxes; hereafter the ‘Board’ has issued the circular no. 21/2015 dated 10.12.2015 clearly envisaging therein that department’s pending appeals before the tribunal/high courts are to be withdrawn/not pressed as per the above stated circular. The same has been declared to be having retrospective effect in other words. We take into consideration the above stated Board’s circular and dismiss the instant appeal accordingly. The Revenue’s appeal ITA No.1459/Ahd/2015 is dismissed for involving low tax effect.

3.

We advert to assessee’s Cross Objection No.177/Ahd/2015 seeking to reverse both the lower authorities’ action disallowing administrative expenditure of Rs.1,24,000/- under Rule 8D(2)(iii) of the Income Tax Rules as pertaining to the exempt income in question in the nature of dividend to the tune of Rs. 1,81,76,516/-. We notice that the CIT(A) has already entered into a detailed discussion that the assessee has incurred indirect administrative expenditure in reviewing its investments/maintaining activities of the stock holding activity in the relevant previous year. Learned counsel fails to dispute the fact that the above computation formula prescribed under Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules is applicable from assessment year 2008-09 onwards. We therefore see no reason to interfere with the impugned administrative

ITA No. 1459/Ahd/15 with 177/Ahd/15 [M/s. Kargil Holding Pvt. Ltd.] - 3 – A.Y. 2011-12

expenditure disallowance. The same stands confirmed. Assessee’s cross objection fails accordingly.

4.

The Revenue’s appeal ITA No.1459/Ahd/2015 as well as assessee’s Cross Objection i.e. C.O. No.177/Ahd/2015 are therefore dismissed.

[Pronounced in the open Court on this the 30th day of January, 2018.] (PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA) (S. S. GODARA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Ahmedabad: Dated 30/01/2018S.K.SINHA आदेश क" ""त"ल"प अ"े"षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. राज"व / Revenue 2. आवेदक / Assessee 3. संबं"धत आयकर आयु"त / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु"त- अपील / CIT (A)

5.

"वभागीय ""त"न"ध, आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. गाड" फाइल / Guard file. By order/आदेश से,

उप/सहायक पंजीकार आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, अहमदाबाद ।

More judgments on Section 14A

All 15,875 judgments and leading authorities on Section 14A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →