DEPUTY COMMISSINOER OF INCOME TAX,, CHENNAI vs. CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the CESTAT had previously held that motor vehicle dealers did render services to the assessee, overturning the basis of the Assessing Officer's disallowance. Therefore, the issue was set aside to the Assessing Officer to verify with reference to the CESTAT order.
What were the facts?
The assessee, an insurance company, made payments to motor vehicle dealers for arranging finance for customers. The Assessing Officer disallowed these payments, relying on an investigation by the Directorate of Service Tax which suggested no services were rendered. The assessee had challenged the service tax proceedings before the CESTAT.
What were the issues?
Whether payments made to motor vehicle dealers for arranging finance are allowable business expenditure when the basis of disallowance by the AO has been overturned by a higher tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(12)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Rotork Controls India Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT739 citing314 ITR 62 · 2009 · SC
- GE India Technology Centre Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT663 citing327 ITR 456 · 2010 · SC · Read judgment
- Ishikawajima Harima Heavy Industries Ltd. v. DIT394 citing288 ITR 408 · 2007 · SC
- CIT v. Toshoku Ltd.270 citing125 ITR 525 · 1980 · SC
- Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh v. CIT243 citing239 ITR 587 · 1999 · SC
- DCIT v. National Insurance Co.Ltd.53 citing72 Taxmann.com 116 · 2016 · ITAT
- CIT v. S.C. Takur & Brothers24 citing322 ITR 252
- CIT v. M/s.Birla Global Asset Finance Co.Ltd.22 citing76 DTR 342 · 2012
- United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Jt. CIT17 citing97 Taxmann.com 466 · 2018
- Principal Commissioner of Income Tax LTU, New Delhi v. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.16 citing118 Taxmann.com 248 · 2020 · HC
- M/s. GIC v. ACIT14 citing422 ITR 248
- 164 Taxmann.com 5312 citing164 Taxmann.com 53
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, 'ए' न्यायपीठ, चेन्नई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 'A' BENCH: CHENNAI श्री एबी टी. वर्की, न्यायिक सदस्य एवं श्री मनोज कुमार अग्रवाल, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.1282, 1283, 1284 & 1285/Chny/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Years: 2011-12, 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 M/s. Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co. Ltd., Dare House, 2nd Floor, No.2, N.S.C. Bose Road, Chennai-600 001. v.
The DCIT, Non Corporate Circle-8, Chennai. [PAN: AABCC 6633 K] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.470, 1339, 1438, 1462 & 1463/Chny/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2018-19, 2011-12, 2016-17 & 2017-18 The DCIT, Non Corporate Circle-8, Chennai. (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) M/s. Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co. Ltd., Dare House, 2nd Floor, No.2, N.S.C. Bose Road, Chennai-600 001. [PAN: AABCC 6633 K] (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent)
Assessee by Mr. Sandeep Bagmar, Advocate; Mr. Balachandar, FCA Department by Mr. Nilay Baran Som, CIT सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing 22.01.2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date of Pronouncement 19.03.2025 ITA No.1282, 1283 to 1285/
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 40(a)(i)
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
- DDIT(It)- 1(1), Mumbai vs M/S. American Express Bank Ltd., MumbaiITA 5667/MUM/2004[2000-01]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-01
- Eurofins Peenya Resources Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1116/BANG/2023[2016-17]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Azure Green Tech Private Limited, Delhi vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 6199/DEL/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Azure Green Tech Private Limited, Delhi vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 6198/DEL/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- S.T.Promotors vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026