DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX , CHENNAI vs. CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CESTAT had previously ruled in favour of the assessee in a related service tax matter, establishing that services were indeed rendered by the motor vehicle dealers. Therefore, the AO's disallowance based on the Service Tax report was incorrect.
What were the facts?
The assessee, an insurance company, appealed against disallowances made by the Assessing Officer (AO) regarding payments to motor vehicle dealers. The AO's disallowance was based on a Service Tax Directorate report suggesting no services were rendered.
What were the issues?
Whether payments made to motor vehicle dealers for services rendered are allowable as a deduction, and if the AO's disallowance based on a Service Tax investigation was justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(12)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Rotork Controls India Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT739 citing314 ITR 62 · 2009 · SC
- GE India Technology Centre Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT663 citing327 ITR 456 · 2010 · SC · Read judgment
- Ishikawajima Harima Heavy Industries Ltd. v. DIT394 citing288 ITR 408 · 2007 · SC
- CIT v. Toshoku Ltd.270 citing125 ITR 525 · 1980 · SC
- Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh v. CIT243 citing239 ITR 587 · 1999 · SC
- DCIT v. National Insurance Co.Ltd.53 citing72 Taxmann.com 116 · 2016 · ITAT
- CIT v. S.C. Takur & Brothers24 citing322 ITR 252
- CIT v. M/s.Birla Global Asset Finance Co.Ltd.22 citing76 DTR 342 · 2012
- United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Jt. CIT17 citing97 Taxmann.com 466 · 2018
- Principal Commissioner of Income Tax LTU, New Delhi v. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.16 citing118 Taxmann.com 248 · 2020 · HC
- M/s. GIC v. ACIT14 citing422 ITR 248
- 164 Taxmann.com 5312 citing164 Taxmann.com 53
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, 'ए' न्यायपीठ, चेन्नई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 'A' BENCH: CHENNAI श्री एबी टी. वर्की, न्यायिक सदस्य एवं श्री मनोज कुमार अग्रवाल, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.1282, 1283, 1284 & 1285/Chny/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Years: 2011-12, 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 M/s. Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co. Ltd., Dare House, 2nd Floor, No.2, N.S.C. Bose Road, Chennai-600 001. v.
The DCIT, Non Corporate Circle-8, Chennai. [PAN: AABCC 6633 K] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.470, 1339, 1438, 1462 & 1463/Chny/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2018-19, 2011-12, 2016-17 & 2017-18 The DCIT, Non Corporate Circle-8, Chennai. (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) v. M/s. Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co. Ltd., Dare House, 2nd Floor, No.2, N.S.C. Bose Road, Chennai-600 001. [PAN: AABCC 6633 K] (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent)
Assessee by Department by : Mr. Sandeep Bagmar, Advocate; Mr. Balachandar, FCA : Mr. Nilay Baran Som, CIT सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing : 22.01.2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 19.03.2025 ITA No.1282, 12
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 37(1)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Smit Navnitlal Soni, Ahmedabad, Gujarat vs ITO Ward-5(3)(1), Ahmedabad, GujaratITA 1434/AHD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shobha Sudamrao Tagad, Ahmednagar vs ITO WD-1, AhmednagarITA 311/PUN/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Digjam Limited, Jamnagar vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 349/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 839/IND/2025[2023-2024]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2023-2024
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026