M/S.KANNAN DEVAN HILLS PLANTATIONS CO. P. LTD,MUNNAR vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the deduction under Section 80IA, following a High Court judgment. It also allowed the expenditure on cattle keepers as a labor welfare measure directly relatable to the tea business.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deduction under Section 80IA for electricity distribution income and expenditure for cattle keepers. The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s orders allowing certain claims.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is eligible for deduction under Section 80IA for electricity distribution and if cattle keeper expenses are allowable business expenditure.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 80IA,Section 195,Section 40(a)(i),Section 10(30),Section 14A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(6)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Rajendra Prasad Moody386 citing115 ITR 519 · 1978 · SC
- CIT v. Toshoku Ltd.270 citing125 ITR 525 · 1980 · SC
- Armyesh Global v. Asstt. CIT40 citing51 SOT 564 · 2012 · ITAT
- CEAT International S.A v. CIT16 citing237 ITR 859 · HC
- McLeod Russel India Ltd. v. CIT11 citing260 CTR 337 · 2013 · HC
- 8.2 DCIT v. Ardeshi10 citing7 DTR 51 · 2008 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH
PER BENCH:
These are cross appeals, directed against three separate orders of the CIT(A)-I, Kochi
of different dates. The relevant assessment years are 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13. 2. Since common issues are raised in these appeals and they pertain to the same
assessee, they were heard together and a
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80IA
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Klsr Infratech Limited, Hyderabad vs DCIT, Central Circle-1(2), HyderabadITA 2323/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026