THE ITO, WD-2(3), RANGE-2, TRIVANDRUM, TRIVANDRUM vs. M/S.PALODE SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD, TRIVANDRUM
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee, being a primary agricultural credit society registered under the Kerala Cooperative Societies Act, is entitled to the deduction under Section 80P(2). This decision followed the jurisdictional High Court's ruling in Chirakkal Service Co-operative Bank Ltd.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a primary agricultural credit society, claimed a deduction of Rs. 45,10,493 under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the IT Act for AY 2013-14. The Assessing Officer denied this deduction, citing Section 80P(4) as the assessee was engaged in banking business.
What were the issues?
Whether a primary agricultural credit society is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) despite engaging in banking activities, in light of Section 80P(4).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. CIT631 citing384 ITR 490 · 2016 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN
Before: Shri Chandra Poojari, AM & Shri George George K, JM
Per George George K, JM
This appeal at the instance of the Revenue is directed against the order of the CIT(A) dated 08.11.2017. The relevant assessment year is 2013-2014.
The solitary issue raised in this appeal is whether the assessee is entitled to deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the I.T.Act.
Briefly stated the facts of the case are as follows:
The assessee is primary agricultural credit society registered under the Kerala Cooperative Societies Act, 1969. For the assessment year 2013-14, the assessee had filed
ITA No.634/Coch/2017. 2 M/s.Palode Service Co-op Bank Ltd. return of income declaring `Nil’ income after claiming deduction amounting to Rs.45,10,493 u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the I.T. Act. The assessment u/s. 143(3) of the Act was completed vide order dated 28.01.2016 by denying the deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the I.T. Act. The reasoning of the Assessing Officer for denying the claim of deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act was that the assessee was primarily engaged in the business of banking and therefore, in view of the provisions of section 80P(4) of the I.T. Act which was inserted with effect from 01.04.2007, the assessee was not entitled to deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the I.T.Act.
Aggrieved by the order of the assessment, the assessee preferred appeal before the first appellate authority. The CIT(A), following the judgment of the Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Chirakkal Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. (384 ITR 490) held that the assessee is entitled to deduction u/s. 80P(2) of the I.T. Act and directed the Assessing Officer to allow deduction u/s. 80P of the Act.
Aggrieved by the order of the CIT(A), the Revenue has filed the present appeal before us. The learned Departmental Representative relied on the grounds raised. None was present on behalf of the assessee, however, we proceed to dispose off the appeal on merits.
We have heard the learned DR and perused the material on record. Admittedly, the assessee is primary agricultural credit society registered under the Kerala Cooperative
ITA No.634/Coch/2017. 3 M/s.Palode Service Co-op Bank Ltd. Societies Act, 1969. The Hon'ble High Court of Kerala in the case of Chirakkal Service Co-op Bank Ltd. (supra) had held that a primary agricultural credit society, registered under the Kerala Cooperative Societies Act, 1969 is entitled to the benefit of deduction u/s. 80P(2). The Hon'ble High Court was considering the following substantial question of law:
a) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case under consideration, the Tribunal is correct in law in deciding against the assessee, the issue regarding entitlement for exemption under section 80P, ignoring the fact that the assessee is a primary agricultural credit society?
6.1 In considering the above question of law, the Hon'ble High Court rendered the following findings:
"15. Appellants in these different appeals are indisputably societies registered under the Kerala co- operative societies Act 1969, for short KCS Act, and the bye-laws of each of them, as made available to this court as part of the paper books, clearly show that they have been classified as primary agricultural credit societies by the competent authority under the provisions of that Act The parliament having defined the term 'co-operative society' for the purposes of the BR Act with reference to, among other things, the registration of a society under any State law relating to co-operative societies for the time being; it cannot but be taken that the purpose of the societies so registered under the State Law and its objects have to be understood as those which have been approved by the competent authority under such State law. This, we visualise as due reciprocative legislative exercise by the Parliament recognising the predominance of decisions rendered under the relevant State Law. In this view
ITA No.634/Coch/2017. 4 M/s.Palode Service Co-op Bank Ltd. of the matter. all the appellants having been classified as primary agricultural credit societies by the competent authority under the KCS Act it has necessarily to be held that the principal object of such societies is to undertake agricultural credit activities and to provide loans and advances for agricultural purposes, the rate 'of interest on such loans and advances to be at the rate fixed by the Registrar of co-operative societies under the KCS Ad and having its area of operation confined to a village, panchayat or a municipality. This is the consequence of the definition clause in section 2(oaa) of the KCS Act The authorities under the IT Act cannot probe into any issue or such matter relating to such applicants. 16. The position of law being as above with reference to the statutory provisions, the appellants had shown to the authorities and the Tribunal that they are primary agricultural credit societies in terms of clause (cciv) of section 5 of the BR Act having regard to the primary object or principal business of each of the appellants. It is also clear from the materials on record that the bye-laws of each of the appellants do not permit admission of any other co-operative society as member, except may be, in accordance with the proviso to sub-clause 2 of section 5(cciv) of the BR Act. The different orders of the Tribunal which are impeached in these appeals do not contain any finding of fact to the effect that the bye- laws of any of the appellant or its classification by the competent authority under the KCS Act is anything different from what we have stated herein above. For this reason, it cannot but be held that the appellants are entitled to exemption from the provisions of section 80P of the IT Act by virtue of sub- section 4 of that sect; on. In this view of the matter, the appeals succeed. 17. In the light of the aforesaid, we answer substantial question ‘A’ in favour of the appellants and hold that the Tribunal erred in law in deciding the issue regarding the entitlement of exemption
ITA No.634/Coch/2017. 5 M/s.Palode Service Co-op Bank Ltd. under section 80P against the appellants. We hold that the primary agricultural credit societies, registered as such under the KCS Act and classified so, under that Act including the appellants are entitled to such exemption.” 6.2 In view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Chirakkal Service Co-op Bank Ltd. (supra), we hold that the assessee-society is entitled to the benefit of deduction u/s. 80P(2) of the Act. It is ordered accordingly.
In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced on this 02nd day of August, 2018.
Sd/- Sd/- (Chandra Poojari) (George George K.) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
Cochin ; Dated : 02nd August, 2018. Devdas*
Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent. 3. The CIT (Appeals), Thiruvananthapuram. 4. The Pr.CIT Thiruvananthapuram. 5. DR, ITAT, Cochin 6. Guard file.
BY ORDER,
(Asstt. Registrar) ITAT, Cochin
More judgments on Section 80P(2)(a)(i)
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- The Development Multipurpose Credit &… vs ITO Ward 2 (4), Porbandar, GujaratITA 458/RJT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hislop College Employees Cooperative Credit… vs ITO Ward 2(3), NagpurITA 184/NAG/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- Nallathambi Thangaraj vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S. Hira Films PVT. LTD. vs. M/S. Prasad Film Labs (Mumbai) Private LimitedBombay · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Jung Bahadur Singh, Through Its Proprietor, Jang Bahadur Singh vs. The Union Of INDIA, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026